BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31524107)

  • 1. Microphone directionality and wind noise reduction enhance speech perception in users of the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
    Hagen R; Radeloff A; Stark T; Anderson I; Nopp P; Aschbacher E; Möltner A; Khajehnouri Y; Rak K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31524107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception in noise and sound localization using different microphone modes in pediatric bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Müller V; Krause J; Klünter HD; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 May; 156():111117. PubMed ID: 35366421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor.
    De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved performance with automatic sound management 3 in the MED-EL SONNET 2 cochlear implant audio processor.
    Kurz A; Rak K; Hagen R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274446. PubMed ID: 36108069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
    Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness.
    Kurz A; Zanzinger M; Hagen R; Rak K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 278(6):2067-2077. PubMed ID: 33141254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.
    Plasmans A; Rushbrooke E; Moran M; Spence C; Theuwis L; Zarowski A; Offeciers E; Atkinson B; McGovern J; Dornan D; Leigh J; Kaicer A; Hollow R; Martelli L; Looi V; Nel E; Del Dot J; Cowan R; Mauger SJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 83():193-9. PubMed ID: 26968076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Intelligibility in Noise With a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor.
    Wimmer W; Weder S; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jan; 37(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 26427637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving Cochlear Implant Performance in the Wind Through Spectral Masking Release: A Multi-microphone and Multichannel Strategy.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):420-432. PubMed ID: 31425361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microphone directionality, pre-emphasis filter, and wind noise in cochlear implants.
    Chung K; McKibben N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):586-600. PubMed ID: 22192604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.