These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31524431)

  • 1. The benefit to speech intelligibility of hearing a familiar voice.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 31524431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1465-1476. PubMed ID: 32105143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Long Does It Take for a Voice to Become Familiar? Speech Intelligibility and Voice Recognition Are Differentially Sensitive to Voice Training.
    Holmes E; To G; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):903-915. PubMed ID: 33979256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using spatial release from masking to estimate the magnitude of the familiar-voice intelligibility benefit.
    Domingo Y; Holmes E; Macpherson E; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3487. PubMed ID: 31795686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.
    Flaherty MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1369195. PubMed ID: 38784624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-evoked brain activity is more robust to competing speech when it is spoken by someone familiar.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118107. PubMed ID: 33933598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar.
    Holmes E; Domingo Y; Johnsrude IS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30096018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a consistent target or masker voice on target speech intelligibility in two- and three-talker mixtures.
    Samson F; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1037-46. PubMed ID: 27036241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clearly, fame isn't everything: Talker familiarity does not augment talker adaptation.
    Hatter ER; King CJ; Shorey AE; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):962-975. PubMed ID: 36417128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.
    Sullivan JR; Assmann PF; Hossain S; Schafer EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1643. PubMed ID: 28372046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility benefit for familiar voices is not accompanied by better discrimination of fundamental frequency or vocal tract length.
    Holmes E; Johnsrude IS
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108704. PubMed ID: 36701896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Highly accurate and robust identity perception from personally familiar voices.
    Kanber E; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Apr; 151(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 34672658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.