These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31524433)

  • 21. Effects of word predictability on eye movements during Arabic reading.
    AlJassmi MA; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; White SJ; Paterson KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 34632557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The modulation of eye movement control by word length in reading Chinese.
    Ma G; Li Z; Xu F; Li X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1620-1631. PubMed ID: 30146970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):826-833. PubMed ID: 28523601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 17853202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dividing lines at the word boundary position helps reading in Chinese.
    Li X; Zhao W; Pollatsek A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):929-34. PubMed ID: 22614759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inhibition of saccade return in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz B; Ashby J; Clifton C
    Vision Res; 2003 Apr; 43(9):1027-34. PubMed ID: 12676245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: an eye-movement study.
    Torrance M; Johansson R; Johansson V; Wengelin Å
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):729-43. PubMed ID: 26120046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers.
    Hawelka S; Gagl B; Wimmer H
    Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20227686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 2527961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.