These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31524826)
1. Individualized Relative-Intensity Physical Activity Accelerometer Cut Points. Siddique J; Aaby D; Montag SE; Sidney S; Sternfeld B; Welch WA; Carnethon MR; Liu K; Craft LL; Pettee Gabriel K; Barone Gibbs B; Reis JP; Freedson P Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 Feb; 52(2):398-407. PubMed ID: 31524826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individualized Accelerometer Activity Cut-Points for the Measurement of Relative Physical Activity Intensity Levels. Gil-Rey E; Maldonado-Martín S; Gorostiaga EM Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):327-335. PubMed ID: 31058588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level. Ozemek C; Cochran HL; Strath SJ; Byun W; Kaminsky LA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():53. PubMed ID: 23547769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring moderate-intensity walking in older adults using the ActiGraph accelerometer. Barnett A; van den Hoek D; Barnett D; Cerin E BMC Geriatr; 2016 Dec; 16(1):211. PubMed ID: 27931188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individualized Estimation of Physical Activity in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Welch WA; Alexander NB; Swartz AM; Miller NE; Twardzik E; Strath SJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Nov; 49(11):2185-2190. PubMed ID: 28640060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objectively measured absolute and relative physical activity intensity levels in postmenopausal women. Gil-Rey E; Maldonado-Martín S; Palacios-Samper N; Gorostiaga EM Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 May; 19(4):539-548. PubMed ID: 30409088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining target heart rate for exercising in a cardiac rehabilitation program: a retrospective study. Sebastian LA; Reeder S; Williams M J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015; 30(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 24866048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From accelerometer output to physical activity intensities in breast cancer patients. Sweegers MG; Buffart LM; Huijsmans RJ; Konings IR; van Zweeden AA; Brug J; Chinapaw MJM; Altenburg TM J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Feb; 23(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 31537492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity for the Actical accelerometer in adults. Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Kronish IM; Moise N; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE J Sports Sci; 2018 Jan; 36(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 28282744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer. Colley RC; Tremblay MS J Sports Sci; 2011 May; 29(8):783-9. PubMed ID: 21424979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New relative intensity ambulatory accelerometer thresholds for elderly men and women: the Generation 100 study. Zisko N; Carlsen T; Salvesen Ø; Aspvik NP; Ingebrigtsen JE; Wisløff U; Stensvold D BMC Geriatr; 2015 Aug; 15():97. PubMed ID: 26238198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancies between methods of identifying objectively determined physical activity. Ham SA; Reis JP; Strath SJ; Dubose KD; Ainsworth BE Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Jan; 39(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 17218884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining accelerometer cut-points for different intensity levels in motor-complete spinal cord injury. Holmlund T; Ekblom-Bak E; Franzén E; Hultling C; Wahman K Spinal Cord; 2020 Jan; 58(1):116-124. PubMed ID: 31243318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accelerometry cut points for physical activity in underserved African Americans. Trumpeter NN; Lawman HG; Wilson DK; Pate RR; Van Horn ML; Tate AK Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Jun; 9():73. PubMed ID: 22697280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are incremental exercise relationships between rating of perceived exertion and oxygen uptake or heart rate reserve valid during steady-state exercises? Ferri Marini C; Micheli L; Grossi T; Federici A; Piccoli G; Zoffoli L; Correale L; Dell'Anna S; Naldini CA; Lucertini F; Vandoni M PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17158. PubMed ID: 38711624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of individual cut points from treadmill walking to assess free-living moderate to vigorous physical activity in obese subjects by accelerometry: is it useful? Aadland E; Steene-Johannessen J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():172. PubMed ID: 23152980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual Scaling of Accelerometry to Preferred Walking Speed in the Assessment of Physical Activity in Older Adults. Karavirta L; Rantalainen T; Skantz H; Lisko I; Portegijs E; Rantanen T J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 75(9):e111-e118. PubMed ID: 32506116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do moderate- to vigorous-intensity accelerometer count thresholds correspond to relative moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity? Raiber L; Christensen RAG; Randhawa AK; Jamnik VK; Kuk JL Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2019 Apr; 44(4):407-413. PubMed ID: 30248278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Physical Activity Assessment of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Accelerometer-Based Cut Points: Scoping Review. Moldovan IA; Bragg A; Nidhiry AS; De La Cruz BA; Mitchell SE Interact J Med Res; 2022 Sep; 11(2):e34433. PubMed ID: 36066937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]