These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3152508)

  • 1. Development of individual growth curve standards for estimated fetal weight: I. Weight estimation procedure.
    Deter RL; Rossavik IK; Harrist RB
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1988 May; 16(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 3152508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of individual growth standards for estimated fetal weight: II. Weight prediction during the third trimester and at birth.
    Deter RL; Rossavik IK; Carpenter RJ
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1989 Feb; 17(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 2492565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
    Kiserud T; Benachi A; Hecher K; Perez RG; Carvalho J; Piaggio G; Platt LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S619-S629. PubMed ID: 29422204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of macrosomia by the individual fetal growth curve assessment method.
    Simon NV; Deter RL; Grow DR; Kofinas AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):793-7. PubMed ID: 2014098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-uterine growth: a comparison of longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches.
    Poisson-Salomon AS; Breart G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1989; 37(5-6):449-59. PubMed ID: 2697045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of perinatal outcome using individualized growth assessment: comparison with conventional methods.
    Ariyuki Y; Hata T; Kitao M
    Pediatrics; 1995 Jul; 96(1 Pt 1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7596719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve.
    Ott WJ; Doyle S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal weight estimation by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging.
    Baker PN; Johnson IR; Gowland PA; Hykin J; Harvey PR; Freeman A; Adams V; Worthington BS; Mansfield P
    Lancet; 1994 Mar; 343(8898):644-5. PubMed ID: 7906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight.
    Ott WJ; Doyle S; Flamm S
    Am J Perinatol; 1985 Jul; 2(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 3893450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Customized growth curves.
    Gardosi J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 40(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 9429785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal Growth Curves: Is There a Universal Reference?
    Grantz KL
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2021 Jun; 48(2):281-296. PubMed ID: 33972066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of fetal weight in utero from symphysis-fundal height and abdominal girth measurements.
    Woo JS; Ngan HY; Au KK; Fung KP; Wong VC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Nov; 25(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 3869449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction: definitions and standards.
    Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 40(4):704-14. PubMed ID: 9429784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Estimation of small and large fetal weight at delivery from ultrasound data].
    Lalys L; Grangé G; Pineau JC
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Oct; 41(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 22748475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individualized growth assessment: evaluation of growth using each fetus as its own control.
    Deter RL
    Semin Perinatol; 2004 Feb; 28(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 15058899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of two formulas for ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight.
    Eik-Nes SH; Gröttum P; Andersson NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1981; 60(6):567-73. PubMed ID: 7336894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal Circumference Alone versus Estimated Fetal Weight after 24 Weeks to Predict Small or Large for Gestational Age at Birth: A Meta-Analysis.
    Blue NR; Yordan JMP; Holbrook BD; Nirgudkar PA; Mozurkewich EL
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Sep; 34(11):1115-1124. PubMed ID: 28672412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.
    Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
    Hedriana HL; Moore TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnosis of altered fetal growth.
    Ott WJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Jun; 15(2):237-63. PubMed ID: 3067166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.