These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31525208)
21. Retrospective Analysis of Hearing-Impaired Adult Patients Treated With an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant. Rader T; Stöver T; Lenarz T; Maier H; Zahnert T; Beleites T; Hagen R; Mlynski R; Baumgartner WD Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):874-881. PubMed ID: 29847467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Sprinzl G; Lenarz T; Ernst A; Hagen R; Wolf-Magele A; Mojallal H; Todt I; Mlynski R; Wolframm MD Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1076-83. PubMed ID: 23714710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria. Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three year experience with the cochlear BAHA attract implant: a systematic review of the literature. Dimitriadis PA; Farr MR; Allam A; Ray J BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2016; 16():12. PubMed ID: 27733813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical and functional outcomes of two types of transcutaneous bone conduction implants. Scotta G; Allam A; Dimitriadis PA; Wright K; Yardley M; Ray J J Laryngol Otol; 2020 Dec; 134(12):1065-1068. PubMed ID: 33336637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system-A systematic literature review. Lagerkvist H; Carvalho K; Holmberg M; Petersson U; Cremers C; Hultcrantz M Clin Otolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 45(5):667-680. PubMed ID: 32386454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Post-implantation clinical cost analysis between transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices. Aukema TW; Teunissen EM; Janssen AM; Hol MKS; Mylanus EAM Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 281(1):117-127. PubMed ID: 37421428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Satisfaction Between Patients Using Percutaneous and Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Svagan M; Povalej Brzan P; Rebol J Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):651-657. PubMed ID: 31083093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results. Hougaard DD; Boldsen SK; Jensen AM; Hansen S; Thomassen PC Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Aug; 274(8):3011-3019. PubMed ID: 28534117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Audiologic, surgical and subjective outcomes of active transcutaneous bone conduction implant system (Bonebridge). Oh SJ; Goh EK; Choi SW; Lee S; Lee HM; Lee IW; Kong SK Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):956-963. PubMed ID: 31460815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech Perception Outcomes in Transcutaneous Versus Percutaneous Bone Conduction Stimulation in Individuals With Single-sided Deafness. Snapp HA; Morgenstein KE; Kuzbyt B Otol Neurotol; 2019 Sep; 40(8):1068-1075. PubMed ID: 31356484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. First United Kingdom experience of the novel Osia active transcutaneous piezoelectric bone conduction implant. Lau K; Scotta G; Wright K; Proctor V; Greenwood L; Dawoud M; Ray J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 277(11):2995-3002. PubMed ID: 32405815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Systematic Review. Cooper T; McDonald B; Ho A Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 28719403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Active Versus Passive Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Forner D; Noel CW; Horwich P; Hong P; Shoman N Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 34191755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Audiological results and subjective benefit of an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device in patients with congenital aural atresia. Volgger V; Schießler IT; Müller J; Schrötzlmair F; Pollotzek M; Hempel JM Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 May; 279(5):2345-2352. PubMed ID: 34173875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Audiometric Comparison Between the First Patients With the Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant and Matched Percutaneous Bone Anchored Hearing Device Users. Rigato C; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Jansson KJ; Hol MK; Eeg-Olofsson M Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1381-7. PubMed ID: 27631828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. Bianchin G; Bonali M; Russo M; Tribi L ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2015; 77(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 25661010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis. Hundertpfund J; Meyer JE; Ovari A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 279(7):3309-3326. PubMed ID: 34424382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early Results With the New Active Bone-Conduction Hearing Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lein A; Baumgartner WD; Riss D; Gstöttner W; Landegger LD; Liu DT; Thurner T; Vyskocil E; Brkic FF Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jun; 170(6):1630-1647. PubMed ID: 38529662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adverse events associated with Bonebridge and Osia bone conduction implant devices. Crowder HR; Bestourous DE; Reilly BK Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(4):102968. PubMed ID: 33676070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]