These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31525724)

  • 1. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs.
    Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of performance of genetics 4N6 FLOQSwabs™ with or without surfactant to rayon swabs.
    Frippiat C; Noel F
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Aug; 42():96-9. PubMed ID: 27314974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
    Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario.
    Alketbi SK
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a novel material, Diomics X-Swab™, for collection of DNA.
    Marshall PL; Stoljarova M; Larue BL; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():192-8. PubMed ID: 25016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
    Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.