These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31526641)
1. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound combined with HD flow model for uterus scar diverticulum. Zheng F; Kong L; Wang H; Fan H; Gong H; Zhang K; Du L J Infect Public Health; 2020 Dec; 13(12):2014-2019. PubMed ID: 31526641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies and Other Pregnancies Implanted in the Lower Uterus by Ultrasound Parameters. Li K; Dai Q Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8904507. PubMed ID: 33457421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Scar Myometrium Thickness and Previous Cesarean Scar Defect Using the Three-Dimensional Vaginal Ultrasound. Shi L; Du K Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():3584572. PubMed ID: 36262982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cesarean section scar diverticulum evaluation by saline contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: The relationship between variable parameters and longer menstrual bleeding. Yao M; Wang W; Zhou J; Sun M; Zhu J; Chen P; Wang X J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 28168867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section. Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus]. Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Interest of saline contrast sonohysterography for the diagnosis of cesarean scar defects]. Giral E; Capmas P; Levaillant JM; Berman A; Fernandez H Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Nov; 43(11):693-8. PubMed ID: 26603330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar. Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy based on size of cesarean scar diverticulum and its significance in clinical decision-making. Du Q; Liu G; Zhao W J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 May; 46(5):707-714. PubMed ID: 32153107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean section scar diverticulum: appearance on hysterosalpingography. Surapaneni K; Silberzweig JE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):870-4. PubMed ID: 18356431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth. Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Changes in the Cesarean Scar and Uterus Between One and Two Years after Cesarean Section Using 3D T2w SPACE MRI. Qi YF; He YL; Ding N; Ma LK; Qian TY; Li Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY Chin Med Sci J; 2022 Jun; 37(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 35796339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnose and treatment of post-cesarean section scar diverticulum by hysteroscopy combined ultrasonography and laparoscopy]. Yuan J; Duan H; Guo Y; Wang J; Cheng J; Ye H Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 50(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 26080939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal management of cesarean scar section diverticulum: a novel surgical treatment. Chen Y; Chang Y; Yao S Med Sci Monit; 2014 Aug; 20():1395-9. PubMed ID: 25104647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study. Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Armstrong V; Hansen WF; Van Voorhis BJ; Syrop CH Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 101(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 12517646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis on clinical association of uterine scar diverticulum with subsequent infertility in patients underwent cesarean section. Bi B; Gao S; Ruan F; Shi Y; Jiang Y; Liu S; Lv W Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(41):e27531. PubMed ID: 34731147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unraveling the enigma: A case of dynamic morphological changes in the niche at 25 weeks of gestation recapitulating the ontogenesis of uterine scar dehiscence. Muto M; Kurokawa Y; Horinouchi T; Yokomine M; Yoshizato T; Tsuda N J Clin Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 51(7):1179-1181. PubMed ID: 37571810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]