These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31527139)
1. Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review. Ong YT; Yoon NYS; Yap HW; Lim EG; Tay KT; Toh YP; Chin A; Radha Krishna LK J Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 46(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 31527139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019. Yoon NYS; Ong YT; Yap HW; Tay KT; Lim EG; Cheong CWS; Lim WQ; Chin AMC; Toh YP; Chiam M; Mason S; Krishna LKR BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):51. PubMed ID: 32611436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review. Hong DZ; Goh JL; Ong ZY; Ting JJQ; Wong MK; Wu J; Tan XH; Toh RQE; Chiang CLL; Ng CWH; Ng JCK; Ong YT; Cheong CWS; Tay KT; Tan LHS; Phua GLG; Fong W; Wijaya L; Neo SHS; Lee ASI; Chiam M; Chin AMC; Krishna LKR BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jun; 21(1):338. PubMed ID: 34107935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of interprofessional mentoring in medicine from 2000 to 2019. Tay KT; Tan XH; Tan LHE; Vythilingam D; Chin AMC; Loh V; Toh YP; Krishna LKR J Interprof Care; 2021; 35(6):927-939. PubMed ID: 33290115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of a Clinical Ethics Committee in Residential Aged Long-Term Care Settings: A Systematic Review. Holmes AL; Bugeja L; Ibrahim JE J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1852-1861.e8. PubMed ID: 32736991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Ethics Committee in an Oncological Research Hospital: two-years Report. Perin M; De Panfilis L; Nurs Ethics; 2023; 30(7-8):1217-1231. PubMed ID: 37326119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Curricula and learning objectives in nurse practitioner programmes: a scoping review protocol. Ljungbeck B; Forss KS; Finnbogadóttir H; Carlson E BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e028699. PubMed ID: 31345974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ethical judgments exhibited by clients and ethics consultants in Japan. Nagao N; Kadooka Y; Asai A BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():19. PubMed ID: 24592932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery. Lee FQH; Chua WJ; Cheong CWS; Tay KT; Hian EKY; Chin AMC; Toh YP; Mason S; Krishna LKR J Med Educ Curric Dev; 2019; 6():2382120519888915. PubMed ID: 31903425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scoping review of mentor training programs in medicine between 1990 and 2017. Sheri K; Too JYJ; Chuah SEL; Toh YP; Mason S; Radha Krishna LK Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1555435. PubMed ID: 31671284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic scoping review of undergraduate medical ethics education programs from 1990 to 2020. Wong MK; Hong DZH; Wu J; Ting JJQ; Goh JL; Ong ZY; Toh RQE; Chiang CLL; Ng CWH; Ng JCK; Cheong CWS; Tay KT; Tan LHS; Ong YT; Chiam M; Chin AMC; Mason S; Radha Krishna LK Med Teach; 2022 Feb; 44(2):167-186. PubMed ID: 34534043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC). Perin M; Magelssen M; Ghirotto L; De Panfilis L BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e067335. PubMed ID: 36894200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees. Magelssen M; Pedersen R; Miljeteig I; Ervik H; Førde R J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 31488518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of an online comment system in clinical ethics consultation. Hauschildt K; Paul TK; De Vries R; Smith LB; Vercler CJ; Shuman AG AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(3):153-160. PubMed ID: 28949894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardisation of delivery and assessment of research training for specialty trainees based on curriculum requirements: recommendations based on a scoping review. Rangan A; Pitchford J; Williams P; Wood B; Robson S BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013955. PubMed ID: 28167745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The establishment of a hospital clinical ethics committee. Manning P; Smith D Ir Med J; 2002 Feb; 95(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 11989950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. Magelssen M; Pedersen R; Førde R HEC Forum; 2016 Sep; 28(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 26248504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of orientation practices for ethics consultation at Harvard Medical School-affiliated hospitals. Zaidi D; Kesselheim JC J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 28780527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? Moodley K; Kabanda SM; Soldaat L; Kleinsmidt A; Obasa AE; Kling S BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):115. PubMed ID: 33208150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes. Bell JAH; Salis M; Tong E; Nekolaichuk E; Barned C; Bianchi A; Buchman DZ; Rodrigues K; Shanker RR; Heesters AM BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):99. PubMed ID: 36167536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]