203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31527720)
1. The outcome of skeletofacial reconstruction with mandibular rotation for management of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity: A three-dimensional computer-assisted investigation.
Wu TY; Denadai R; Lin HH; Ho CT; Lo LJ
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13337. PubMed ID: 31527720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional effect of pitch, roll, and yaw rotations on maxillomandibular complex movement.
Kim SJ; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Jung YS; Baik HS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 25557879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Accuracy and Stability of Intentional Change of Frontal-Ramal Inclination in Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry Patients.
Ha SH; Meny AH; Jeong CG; Yeo JH; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):e462-e468. PubMed ID: 37010321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison between computer aided simulation and dental model orthognathic surgery for the treatment of patients with mandibular excess and facial asymmetries].
Shen SY; Chen TT; Lu CP; Jiang TF; Wang XD; Shen GF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):651-655. PubMed ID: 27806756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Does two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional surgical simulation produce better surgical outcomes among patients with class III facial asymmetry?
Udomlarptham N; Lin CH; Wang YC; Ko EW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1022-1031. PubMed ID: 29606563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment outcome of bimaxillary surgery for asymmetric skeletal class II deformity.
Chen YF; Liao YF; Chen YA; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):623-632. PubMed ID: 29728860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional surgical changes of mandibular proximal segments affect outcome of jaw motion analysis.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Alazizi AI; Lin CH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 73(5):971-84. PubMed ID: 25659358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.
Kim YJ; Lee Y; Chun YS; Kang N; Kim SJ; Kim M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 24071374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.
Wang TH; Chen YF; Chen YA; Yao CF; Xi T; Liao YF; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):334. PubMed ID: 38780816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical Accuracy of 3D Virtual Surgery and CAD/CAM-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery for Skeletal Class III Patients.
Ha SH; Youn SM; Kim CY; Jeong CG; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 34(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 36044286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of Surgery-First Approach in Treating Skeletal Dentofacial Asymmetry with Orthognathic Surgery.
Chen Z; Zhong Y; Li B; Ma H; Lei B; Yang B
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 34(6):1817-1821. PubMed ID: 37276330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oral Rehabilitation With Orthognathic Surgery After Dental Implant Placement for Class III Malocclusion With Skeletal Asymmetry and Posterior Bite Collapse.
Ohba S; Nakatani Y; Kawasaki T; Tajima N; Tobita T; Yoshida N; Sawase T; Asahina I
Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):487-90. PubMed ID: 26035376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical Stability After Proximal Segment Angle Alteration in Patients With Class III Facial Asymmetry.
Lee SF; Chen YA; Lin CH; Wen-Ching Ko E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jun; 81(6):734-745. PubMed ID: 37011882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla using novel intermediate splints in maxilla-first orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III deformity.
Lin YH; Yao CF; Chen YA; Liao YF; Chen YR
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Feb; 28(2):141. PubMed ID: 38340152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion.
Chen YJ; Yao CC; Chang ZC; Lai HH; Lu SC; Kok SH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 44(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 27107473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
