200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31527753)
1. Benchmarking urine storage and collection conditions for evaluating the female urinary microbiome.
Jung CE; Chopyk J; Shin JH; Lukacz ES; Brubaker L; Schwanemann LK; Knight R; Wolfe AJ; Pride DT
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13409. PubMed ID: 31527753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Variation in Urine Sample Storage Conditions on 16S Urogenital Microbiome Analyses.
Kumar T; Bryant M; Cantrell K; Song SJ; McDonald D; Tubb HM; Farmer S; Lukacz ES; Brubaker L; Knight R
mSystems; 2023 Feb; 8(1):e0102922. PubMed ID: 36475896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard Sample Storage Conditions Have an Impact on Inferred Microbiome Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.
Poulsen CS; Kaas RS; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0138721. PubMed ID: 34612701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. VMG II transport medium stabilises oral microbiome samples for Next-Generation Sequencing.
Adler CJ; White A; Bockmann M; Browne GV; Townsend G; Hughes T
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():91-98. PubMed ID: 29155022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in the microbiome due to storage preservatives are not large enough to obscure variations due to factors such as host population, host species, body site, and captivity.
Asangba AE; Donohue ME; Lamb A; Wright PC; Halajian A; Leigh SR; Stumpf RM
Am J Primatol; 2019 Oct; 81(10-11):e23045. PubMed ID: 31471974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy.
Luo T; Srinivasan U; Ramadugu K; Shedden KA; Neiswanger K; Trumble E; Li JJ; McNeil DW; Crout RJ; Weyant RJ; Marazita ML; Foxman B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(18):5519-29. PubMed ID: 27371581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A protocol for urine collection and storage prior to DNA methylation analysis.
Bosschieter J; Bach S; Bijnsdorp IV; Segerink LI; Rurup WF; van Splunter AP; Bahce I; Novianti PW; Kazemier G; van Moorselaar RJA; Steenbergen RDM; Nieuwenhuijzen JA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200906. PubMed ID: 30142219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of commercially-available preservatives for maintaining the integrity of bacterial DNA in human milk.
Lackey KA; Williams JE; Price WJ; Carrothers JM; Brooker SL; Shafii B; McGuire MA; McGuire MK
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Oct; 141():73-81. PubMed ID: 28802721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple solution to preserve plant samples for microbiome analyses.
Carvalhais LC; Dennis PG; Poudel A; Birt HWG; Bhuiyan SA; Card SD; Joyce PA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34695303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies.
Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fecal Aliquot Straw Technique (FAST) allows for easy and reproducible subsampling: assessing interpersonal variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) accumulation.
Romano KA; Dill-McFarland KA; Kasahara K; Kerby RL; Vivas EI; Amador-Noguez D; Herd P; Rey FE
Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):91. PubMed ID: 29776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
