These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles. Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK; BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. VMG II transport medium stabilises oral microbiome samples for Next-Generation Sequencing. Adler CJ; White A; Bockmann M; Browne GV; Townsend G; Hughes T J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():91-98. PubMed ID: 29155022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in the microbiome due to storage preservatives are not large enough to obscure variations due to factors such as host population, host species, body site, and captivity. Asangba AE; Donohue ME; Lamb A; Wright PC; Halajian A; Leigh SR; Stumpf RM Am J Primatol; 2019 Oct; 81(10-11):e23045. PubMed ID: 31471974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy. Luo T; Srinivasan U; Ramadugu K; Shedden KA; Neiswanger K; Trumble E; Li JJ; McNeil DW; Crout RJ; Weyant RJ; Marazita ML; Foxman B Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(18):5519-29. PubMed ID: 27371581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool. Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A protocol for urine collection and storage prior to DNA methylation analysis. Bosschieter J; Bach S; Bijnsdorp IV; Segerink LI; Rurup WF; van Splunter AP; Bahce I; Novianti PW; Kazemier G; van Moorselaar RJA; Steenbergen RDM; Nieuwenhuijzen JA PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200906. PubMed ID: 30142219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of commercially-available preservatives for maintaining the integrity of bacterial DNA in human milk. Lackey KA; Williams JE; Price WJ; Carrothers JM; Brooker SL; Shafii B; McGuire MA; McGuire MK J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Oct; 141():73-81. PubMed ID: 28802721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods]. Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple solution to preserve plant samples for microbiome analyses. Carvalhais LC; Dennis PG; Poudel A; Birt HWG; Bhuiyan SA; Card SD; Joyce PA Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34695303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies. Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study. Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation. Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage. Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants. Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants. Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]