181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31527753)
21. Voided Urinary Microbiota Is Stable Over Time but Impacted by Post Void Storage.
Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Ammitzbøll N; Isse YA; Muqtar A; Jensen AM; Leutscher PDC; Arenholt LTS; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():435. PubMed ID: 32984068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fecal Aliquot Straw Technique (FAST) allows for easy and reproducible subsampling: assessing interpersonal variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) accumulation.
Romano KA; Dill-McFarland KA; Kasahara K; Kerby RL; Vivas EI; Amador-Noguez D; Herd P; Rey FE
Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):91. PubMed ID: 29776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Processing Delay and Storage Conditions on Urine Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio.
Herrington W; Illingworth N; Staplin N; Kumar A; Storey B; Hrusecka R; Judge P; Mahmood M; Parish S; Landray M; Haynes R; Baigent C; Hill M; Clark S
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1794-1801. PubMed ID: 27654930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Establishment of a Standard Tongue Coating Collection Method for Microbiome Studies.
Zeng X; Jin H; Wang C; Li M; Wang R; Li W; Lin F; Chen Y; Chen W; Huang X; Liu J; Zheng M; Jiang X; Chen Q
Biopreserv Biobank; 2023 Dec; 21(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 36730760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of sample preservation on marine microbial diversity analysis.
Oldham AL; Sandifer V; Duncan KE
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Mar; 158():6-13. PubMed ID: 30677454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term stability of microbiome diversity and composition in fecal samples stored in eNAT medium.
Young RR; Jenkins K; Araujo-Perez F; Seed PC; Kelly MS
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1046. PubMed ID: 32390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
Shaw AG; Sim K; Powell E; Cornwell E; Cramer T; McClure ZE; Li MS; Kroll JS
Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 27473284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.
Tap J; Cools-Portier S; Pavan S; Druesne A; Öhman L; Törnblom H; Simren M; Derrien M
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):601. PubMed ID: 30679604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
Mordant A; Kleiner M
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of storage, temperature, and extraction kit on the phylogenetic composition detected in the human milk microbiota.
Lyons KE; Fouhy F; O' Shea CA; Ryan CA; Dempsey EM; Ross RP; Stanton C
Microbiologyopen; 2021 Jan; 10(1):e1127. PubMed ID: 33373099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
