These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31528719)

  • 1. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology.
    Brydges CR
    Innov Aging; 2019 Aug; 3(4):igz036. PubMed ID: 31528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Examination of Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Gaeta L; Brydges CR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1572-1580. PubMed ID: 32343919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.
    Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical considerations for reporting and planning heart rate variability case-control studies.
    Quintana DS
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 27914167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical Inferences Using Effect Sizes in Human Endothelial Function Research.
    Cherubini JM; MacDonald MJ
    Artery Res; 2021; 27(4):176-185. PubMed ID: 34966462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Aloe AM
    Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):403-426. PubMed ID: 33180373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redefining effect size interpretations for psychotherapy RCTs in depression.
    Nordahl-Hansen A; Cogo-Moreira H; Panjeh S; Quintana DS
    J Psychiatr Res; 2024 Jan; 169():38-41. PubMed ID: 38000182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moving Forward to a World Beyond 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 Effects Sizes: New Cutoffs for School-Based Anti-Bullying Interventions.
    Panjeh S; Nordahl-Hansen A; Cogo-Moreira H
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jun; 38(11-12):7843-7851. PubMed ID: 36601910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect sizes of the differences between means without assuming variance equality and between a mean and a constant.
    Aoki S
    Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03306. PubMed ID: 32051873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cohen's and Hedges' g.
    Taylor JM; Alanazi S
    J Nurs Educ; 2023 May; 62(5):316-317. PubMed ID: 37146047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy and reliability of the Suchey-Brooks pubic symphysis age estimation method: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schanandore JV; Wolden M; Smart N
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 34617597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing new cutoffs for Cohen's d: An application using known effect sizes from trials for improving sleep quality on composite mental health.
    Panjeh S; Nordahl-Hansen A; Cogo-Moreira H
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2023 Sep; 32(3):e1969. PubMed ID: 37186318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of effect-size estimates under normals and contaminated normals in meta-analysis.
    Marfo P; Okyere GA
    Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01838. PubMed ID: 31211256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denouncing the use of field-specific effect size distributions to inform magnitude.
    Panzarella E; Beribisky N; Cribbie RA
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11383. PubMed ID: 34178435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists?
    Møller A; Jennions MD
    Oecologia; 2002 Aug; 132(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 28547634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis provides evidence-based effect sizes for a cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the FACT-G.
    King MT; Stockler MR; Cella DF; Osoba D; Eton DT; Thompson J; Eisenstein AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):270-81. PubMed ID: 19716264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.
    Bezeau S; Graves R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.