337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31529150)
21. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on preoperative planning of tibial plateau fractures: a case-control series.
Dodd A; Oddone Paolucci E; Korley R
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():144. PubMed ID: 26071394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures.
Martínez-Rondanelli A; Escobar-González SS; Henao-Alzate A; Martínez-Cano JP
Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 28685399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of Three-dimensional Printing for Tibial Pilon Fracture Diagnosis and Treatment.
Wustro L; Silva JLVD; Moura BAB; Schoenberger HS; Takito D; D'Agostini JCH
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2024 Jun; 59(3):e456-e461. PubMed ID: 38911898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Cho YC; Lee PY; Lee CH; Chen CH; Lin YM
Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 30152606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience.
Foroohar A; Tosti R; Richmond JM; Gaughan JP; Ilyas AM
J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul; 6():38. PubMed ID: 21801370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system.
Charalambous CP; Tryfonidis M; Alvi F; Moran M; Fang C; Samarji R; Hirst P
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 17535620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of 3D printing on inter- and intrarater reliability on the classification of tibial plateau fractures.
Dust T; Hartel MJ; Henneberg JE; Korthaus A; Ballhause TM; Keller J; Ohlmeier M; Maas KJ; Frosch KH; Krause M
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 35941251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.
Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K
Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Pilon fractures : Review of diagnostics and classification].
Wiebking U
Unfallchirurg; 2017 Aug; 120(8):632-639. PubMed ID: 28567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advanced CT visualization improves the accuracy of orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents in classifying proximal humeral fractures: a feasibility study.
Dauwe J; Mys K; Putzeys G; Schader JF; Richards RG; Gueorguiev B; Varga P; Nijs S
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(6):4523-4529. PubMed ID: 32761437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The pilon map: fracture lines and comminution zones in OTA/AO type 43C3 pilon fractures.
Cole PA; Mehrle RK; Bhandari M; Zlowodzki M
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jul; 27(7):e152-6. PubMed ID: 23360909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional computed tomography is not indicated for the classification and characterization of calcaneal fractures.
Veltman ES; van den Bekerom MP; Doornberg JN; Verbeek DO; Rammelt S; Steller EP; Schepers T
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1117-20. PubMed ID: 24530220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures.
Mellema JJ; Doornberg JN; Molenaars RJ; Ring D; Kloen P;
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):944-9. PubMed ID: 26777468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures?
Millán-Billi A; Gómez-Masdeu M; Ramírez-Bermejo E; Ibañez M; Gelber PE
Int Orthop; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 28405810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
