BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31529461)

  • 1. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study.
    Innocenti T; Feller D; Giagio S; Salvioli S; Minnucci S; Brindisino F; Cosentino C; Piano L; Chiarotto A; Ostelo R
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2022; 26(5):100450. PubMed ID: 36270163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
    Page MJ; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
    Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.
    Nawijn F; Ham WHW; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DPJ
    BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the Completeness of Registration and Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Yoga for Health.
    Bethel K; Faciszewski H; Ballis S; Sullivan M; Wieland LS
    J Integr Complement Med; 2024 Apr; 30(4):336-344. PubMed ID: 37967461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review.
    Gundogan B; Dowlut N; Rajmohan S; Borrelli MR; Millip M; Iosifidis C; Udeaja YZ; Mathew G; Fowler A; Agha R
    JAAD Int; 2020 Dec; 1(2):157-174. PubMed ID: 34409336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
    Sharma S; Oremus M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in "evidence-based" Chinese journals.
    Li JL; Ge L; Ma JC; Zeng QL; Yao L; An N; Ding JX; Gan YH; Tian JH
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():58. PubMed ID: 24906805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of PRISMA 2009 on reporting quality in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in high-impact dental medicine journals between 1993-2018.
    Sewell KA; Schellinger J; Bloss JE
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295864. PubMed ID: 38096136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.