These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31529461)

  • 1. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study.
    Innocenti T; Feller D; Giagio S; Salvioli S; Minnucci S; Brindisino F; Cosentino C; Piano L; Chiarotto A; Ostelo R
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2022; 26(5):100450. PubMed ID: 36270163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
    Page MJ; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
    Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
    Yang Q; Xian H; Cheng X; Wu X; Meng J; Chen W; Zeng Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 39107813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsujimoto H; Kataoka Y; Kimachi M; Shimizu S; Ikenoue T; Fukuma S; Yamamoto Y; Fukuhara S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():54-60. PubMed ID: 28242481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, part I: many aspects of conduct and reporting need improvement.
    Kolaski K; Clarke M; Rathnayake D; Romeiser Logan L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111480. PubMed ID: 39047919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the Completeness of Registration and Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Yoga for Health.
    Bethel K; Faciszewski H; Ballis S; Sullivan M; Wieland LS
    J Integr Complement Med; 2024 Apr; 30(4):336-344. PubMed ID: 37967461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.
    Nawijn F; Ham WHW; Houwert RM; Groenwold RHH; Hietbrink F; Smeeing DPJ
    BMC Emerg Med; 2019 Feb; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 30744570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review.
    Gundogan B; Dowlut N; Rajmohan S; Borrelli MR; Millip M; Iosifidis C; Udeaja YZ; Mathew G; Fowler A; Agha R
    JAAD Int; 2020 Dec; 1(2):157-174. PubMed ID: 34409336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
    Sharma S; Oremus M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.