151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31529506)
1. Technical Note: Machine learning approaches for range and dose verification in proton therapy using proton-induced positron emitters.
Li Z; Wang Y; Yu Y; Fan K; Xing L; Peng H
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5748-5757. PubMed ID: 31529506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Range and dose verification in proton therapy using proton-induced positron emitters and recurrent neural networks (RNNs).
Liu C; Li Z; Hu W; Xing L; Peng H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(17):175009. PubMed ID: 31342940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A machine learning framework with anatomical prior for online dose verification using positron emitters and PET in proton therapy.
Hu Z; Li G; Zhang X; Ye K; Lu J; Peng H
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(18):185003. PubMed ID: 32460246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility study of patient-specific dose verification in proton therapy utilizing positron emission tomography (PET) and generative adversarial network (GAN).
Ma S; Hu Z; Ye K; Zhang X; Wang Y; Peng H
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5194-5208. PubMed ID: 32772377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Further investigation of 3D dose verification in proton therapy utilizing acoustic signal, wavelet decomposition and machine learning.
Yao S; Hu Z; Xie Q; Yang Y; Peng H
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Nov; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34768245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning based oxygen and carbon concentration derivation using dual-energy CT for PET-based dose verification in proton therapy.
Liu Y; Zhou L; Peng H
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3347-3360. PubMed ID: 35246842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical note: Implementing MRI/CT-based elemental concentration data to Monte Carlo simulation for yielding positron emitters in proton therapy.
Saito M; Matsumoto R
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 38116829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility study of range verification based on proton-induced acoustic signals and recurrent neural network.
Yao S; Hu Z; Zhang X; Lou E; Liang Z; Wang Y; Peng H
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215017. PubMed ID: 32726760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance.
Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation using PET in proton therapy.
Masuda T; Nishio T; Kataoka J; Arimoto M; Sano A; Karasawa K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(17):175011. PubMed ID: 31307027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A machine learning-based framework for delivery error prediction in proton pencil beam scanning using irradiation log-files.
Maes D; Bowen SR; Regmi R; Bloch C; Wong T; Rosenfeld A; Saini J
Phys Med; 2020 Oct; 78():179-186. PubMed ID: 33038643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extension of the ML-EM algorithm for dose estimation using PET in proton therapy: application to an inhomogeneous target.
Masuda T; Nishio T; Sano A; Karasawa K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(18):185001. PubMed ID: 32485687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An artificial neural network based approach for predicting the proton beam spot dosimetric characteristics of a pencil beam scanning technique.
Ranjith CP; Krishnan M; Raveendran V; Chaudhari L; Laskar S
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Apr; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38652667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of short-lived positron emitters for in-beam and real-time β
Bongrand A; Busato E; Force P; Martin F; Montarou G
Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():248-255. PubMed ID: 31918377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. TPS(PET)-A TPS-based approach for in vivo dose verification with PET in proton therapy.
Frey K; Bauer J; Unholtz D; Kurz C; Krämer M; Bortfeld T; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 59(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 24323977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.
Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
