These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31529643)

  • 1. Radiographic and histologic assessment of osseointegration for surface-treated titanium dental implants: An experimental study in dogs.
    Abdulla MA; Hasan RH; Al-Hyani OH
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2024; 18(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 38881643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the osseointegration potential of a strontium releasing nanostructured titanium oxide surface: A biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia plateau model.
    Isler SC; Bellon B; Foss M; Pippenger B; Stavropoulos A; Andersen OZ
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Feb; 10(1):e812. PubMed ID: 38044566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-supported single-unit crowns with cantilever extension in posterior areas: A retrospective study with a follow-up of at least 10 years.
    Schmid E; Roccuzzo A; Morandini M; Ramseier CA; Sculean A; Salvi GE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 23(2):189-196. PubMed ID: 33448601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extension. A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of at least 10 years.
    Schmid E; Morandini M; Roccuzzo A; Ramseier CA; Sculean A; Salvi GE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1243-1252. PubMed ID: 32991763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non-bruxer patients: A retrospective case-control study.
    Bredberg C; Vu C; Häggman-Henrikson B; Chrcanovic BR
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 36411179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Overload: A Systematic Review Focusing on Occlusal Analysis through Digital and Analogic Methods.
    Di Fiore A; Montagner M; Sivolella S; Stellini E; Yilmaz B; Brunello G
    J Clin Med; 2022 Aug; 11(16):. PubMed ID: 36013048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study.
    Ding Q; Luo Q; Tian Y; Zhang L; Xie Q; Zhou Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4217-4227. PubMed ID: 35129663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-Clinical Models in Implant Dentistry: Past, Present, Future.
    Blanc-Sylvestre N; Bouchard P; Chaussain C; Bardet C
    Biomedicines; 2021 Oct; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 34829765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever: 5-Year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Thoma DS; Wolleb K; Schellenberg R; Strauss FJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2021 Nov; 48(11):1480-1490. PubMed ID: 34448219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral static overload on immediately restored implants decreases the osteocyte index in peri-implant bone: a secondary analysis of a pre-clinical study in dogs.
    de Calais CD; Bordin D; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Negretto A; Shibli JA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):3297-3303. PubMed ID: 33150510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preservation of alveolar ridge height through mechanical memory: A novel dental implant design.
    Yin S; Zhang W; Tang Y; Yang G; Wu X; Lin S; Liu X; Cao H; Jiang X
    Bioact Mater; 2021 Jan; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 32817915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog.
    Heitz-Mayfield LJ; Schmid B; Weigel C; Gerber S; Bosshardt DD; Jönsson J; Lang NP; Jönsson J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 15142087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants.
    Stafford GL
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):87-8. PubMed ID: 25343397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review.
    Chang M; Chronopoulos V; Mattheos N
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 23918506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excessive occlusal load on chemically modified and moderately rough titanium implants restored with cantilever reconstructions. An experimental study in dogs.
    Lima LA; Bosshardt DD; Chambrone L; Araújo MG; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1142-1154. PubMed ID: 31529643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.