These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31530099)

  • 1. From manual to artificial intelligence fitting: Two cochlear implant case studies.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Deggouj N
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Sep; 21(5):299-305. PubMed ID: 31530099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective Comparison Between Manual and Computer-Assisted (FOX) Cochlear Implant Fitting in Newly Implanted Patients.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Derue L; Vanderbemden S; Huaux H; Lacroix E; Deggouj N
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):494-505. PubMed ID: 36607743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a CI Programming Fitting Tool with Artificial Intelligence in Experienced Cochlear Implant Patients.
    Wathour J; Govaerts PJ; Lacroix E; Naïma D
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Mar; 44(3):209-215. PubMed ID: 36728126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the 'Fitting to Outcomes eXpert' (FOX®) with established cochlear implant users.
    Buechner A; Vaerenberg B; Gazibegovic D; Brendel M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts P; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24950595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant telemedicine: Remote fitting based on psychoacoustic self-tests and artificial intelligence.
    Meeuws M; Pascoal D; Janssens de Varebeke S; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Sep; 21(5):260-268. PubMed ID: 32397922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted CI fitting: Is the learning capacity of the intelligent agent FOX beneficial for speech understanding?
    Meeuws M; Pascoal D; Bermejo I; Artaso M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Jul; 18(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 28498083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of 'Fitting to Outcomes Expert' FOX™ with new cochlear implant users in a multi-centre study.
    Battmer RD; Borel S; Brendel M; Buchner A; Cooper H; Fielden C; Gazibegovic D; Goetze R; Govaerts P; Kelleher K; Lenartz T; Mosnier I; Muff J; Nunn T; Vaerenberg B; Vanat Z
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 25118042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.
    Botros A; Banna R; Maruthurkkara S
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):485-94. PubMed ID: 23617610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balancing cochlear implant AGC and near-instantaneous compression to improve perception of soft speech.
    Boyle PJ; Moore BC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16 Suppl 1():S9-11. PubMed ID: 25614273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming.
    Govaerts PJ; Vaerenberg B; De Ceulaer G; Daemers K; De Beukelaer C; Schauwers K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Aug; 31(6):908-18. PubMed ID: 20418791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users.
    Vaerenberg B; Govaerts PJ; de Ceulaer G; Daemers K; Schauwers K
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21091083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Rader T; Doms P; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Strieth S; Baumann U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):502-509. PubMed ID: 29390897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].
    Hey M; Brademann G; Ambrosch P
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):601-7. PubMed ID: 27393292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Optimized Pitch and Language Strategy in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vandali A; Dawson P; Au A; Yu Y; Brown M; Goorevich M; Cowan R
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):555-567. PubMed ID: 30067558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.