123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31530565)
1. Specificity of various cluster criteria used for the detection of glaucomatous visual field abnormalities.
Wu Z; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 104(6):822-826. PubMed ID: 31530565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Fields for Detecting Progressive Central Visual Loss in Glaucoma Eyes with Early Central Abnormalities.
Wu Z; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Girkin CA; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 31742250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
Takahashi G; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1405-1416. PubMed ID: 33722636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Central and Peripheral Visual Field Concordance in Glaucoma.
Odden JL; Mihailovic A; Boland MV; Friedman DS; West SK; Ramulu PY
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 May; 57(6):2797-804. PubMed ID: 27214688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Test Strategy on Octopus Perimeter Cluster Mean Defect Values: Adaptive Bracketing Normal Strategy Versus Tendency-oriented Perimetry.
Holló G
J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):830-834. PubMed ID: 27300642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of the 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Central Visual Field Abnormalities in Glaucoma.
Wu Z; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Zangwill LM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 196():10-17. PubMed ID: 30099037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma.
Shah NN; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Hoffmann EM; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1593-602. PubMed ID: 16949444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glaucoma Diagnostic Capabilities of Foveal Avascular Zone Parameters Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography According to Visual Field Defect Location.
Kwon J; Choi J; Shin JW; Lee J; Kook MS
J Glaucoma; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 29016521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the usefulness of a cluster-based trend analysis to detect visual field progression in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
Aoki S; Murata H; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Miki A; Tanito M; Mizoue S; Mori K; Suzuki K; Yamashita T; Kashiwagi K; Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 101(12):1658-1665. PubMed ID: 28450381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with the presence of parafoveal scotoma in glaucomatous eyes with optic disc hemorrhages.
Dias DT; Almeida I; Sassaki AM; Juncal VR; Ushida M; Lopes FS; Alhadeff P; Ritch R; Prata TS
Eye (Lond); 2018 Oct; 32(10):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 29973693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detectability of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma With High-resolution Perimetry.
Numata T; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Tanabe F; Hashimoto S; Nomoto H; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):847-853. PubMed ID: 27367134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
