178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31530619)
1. Passive versus active intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: does a superior drainage system exist? A protocol for systematic review.
Park L; Baker L; Smith H; Davies A; Abou Khalil J; Martel G; Balaa F; Bertens KA
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e031319. PubMed ID: 31530619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Cheng Y; Xia J; Lai M; Cheng N; He S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010583. PubMed ID: 27764898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Zhang W; He S; Cheng Y; Xia J; Lai M; Cheng N; Liu Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD010583. PubMed ID: 29928755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.
Peng S; Cheng Y; Yang C; Lu J; Wu S; Zhou R; Cheng N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; (8):CD010583. PubMed ID: 26292656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Passive Versus Active Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Pancreatic Resection: Does A Superior Drainage System Exist? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park LJ; Baker L; Smith H; Lemke M; Davis A; Abou-Khalil J; Martel G; Balaa FK; Bertens KA
World J Surg; 2021 Sep; 45(9):2895-2910. PubMed ID: 34046692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.
Čečka F; Jon B; Skalický P; Čermáková E; Neoral Č; Loveček M
Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 30082139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Passive drainage to gravity and closed-suction drainage following pancreatoduodenectomy lead to similar grade B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A meta-analysis.
Gachabayov M; Gogna S; Latifi R; Dong XD
Int J Surg; 2019 Jul; 67():24-31. PubMed ID: 31078675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review.
Čečka F; Loveček M; Jon B; Skalický P; Šubrt Z; Neoral Č; Ferko A
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(40):11458-68. PubMed ID: 26523110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-inferiority of open passive drains compared with closed suction drains in pancreatic surgery outcomes: A prospective observational study.
Marchegiani G; Perri G; Pulvirenti A; Sereni E; Azzini AM; Malleo G; Salvia R; Bassi C
Surgery; 2018 Sep; 164(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 29903511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Čečka F; Loveček M; Jon B; Skalický P; Šubrt Z; Ferko A
Trials; 2015 May; 16():207. PubMed ID: 25947117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).
Witzigmann H; Diener MK; Kienkötter S; Rossion I; Bruckner T; Bärbel Werner ; Pridöhl O; Radulova-Mauersberger O; Lauer H; Knebel P; Ulrich A; Strobel O; Hackert T; Büchler MW
Ann Surg; 2016 Sep; 264(3):528-37. PubMed ID: 27513157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical drain management after the diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: draining-tract-targeted works better than standard management.
Pedrazzoli S; Brazzale AR
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Dec; 405(8):1219-1231. PubMed ID: 33104886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review.
Søreide K; Labori KJ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1147-54. PubMed ID: 27216233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of abdominal drainage in pancreatic resection - A multicenter validation study for early drain removal.
Linnemann RJA; Patijn GA; van Rijssen LB; Besselink MG; Mungroop TH; de Hingh IH; Kazemier G; Festen S; de Jong KP; van Eijck CHJ; Scheepers JJG; van der Kolk M; Dulk MD; Bosscha K; Busch OR; Boerma D; van der Harst E; Nieuwenhuijs VB;
Pancreatology; 2019 Sep; 19(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 31378583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does intraoperative closed-suction drainage influence the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Aumont O; Dupré A; Abjean A; Pereira B; Veziant J; Le Roy B; Pezet D; Buc E; Gagnière J
BMC Surg; 2017 May; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28511699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should Drains Suck? A Propensity Score Analysis of Closed-Suction Versus Closed-Gravity Drainage After Pancreatectomy.
Kone LB; Maker VK; Banulescu M; Maker AV
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 May; 25(5):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 32394123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence.
Diener MK; Tadjalli-Mehr K; Wente MN; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Seiler CM
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2011 Jan; 396(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 20963439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active Intra-Abdominal Drainage Following Abdominal Digestive System Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Zheng M; Niu T; Peng J; Shi L; Shao C
J Invest Surg; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2180115. PubMed ID: 37733388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery.
Hüttner FJ; Probst P; Knebel P; Strobel O; Hackert T; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK
Br J Surg; 2017 May; 104(6):660-668. PubMed ID: 28318008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of surgically placed, intraperitoneal drainage on morbidity and mortality after pancreas resection- A systematic review & meta-analysis.
Schorn S; Nitsche U; Demir IE; Scheufele F; Tieftrunk E; Schirren R; Klauss S; Sargut M; Ceyhan GO; Friess H
Pancreatology; 2018 Apr; 18(3):334-345. PubMed ID: 29534868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
