BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31530762)

  • 1. Count rate performance of brain-dedicated PET scanners: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Teimoorisichani M; Goertzen AL
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215013. PubMed ID: 31530762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of system geometry and other physical factors on photon sensitivity of high-resolution positron emission tomography.
    Habte F; Foudray AM; Olcott PD; Levin CS
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3753-72. PubMed ID: 17664575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of inter-crystal scatter in dual-layer offset scintillator arrays for brain-dedicated PET scanners.
    Teimoorisichani M; Goertzen AL
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(11):115007. PubMed ID: 30933936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovery of inter-detector and inter-crystal scattering in brain PET based on LSO and GAGG crystals.
    Lee S; Kim KY; Lee MS; Lee JS
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195005. PubMed ID: 32575086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design study of a brain-dedicated time-of-flight PET system with a hemispherical detector arrangement.
    Takyu S; Ahmed AM; Yoshida E; Tashima H; Kumagai M; Yamashita T; Yamaya T
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(3):035012. PubMed ID: 31855854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polaroid-PET: a PET scanner with detectors fitted with Polaroid for filtering unpolarized optical photons-a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Sanaat A; Ashrafi-Belgabad A; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235044. PubMed ID: 33263320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo simulations of the count rate performance of a clinical whole-body MR/PET scanner.
    Delso G; Martinez MJ; Torres I; Ladebeck R; Michel C; Nekolla S; Ziegler SI
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4126-35. PubMed ID: 19810486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open-field mouse brain PET: design optimisation and detector characterisation.
    Kyme AZ; Judenhofer MS; Gong K; Bec J; Selfridge A; Du J; Qi J; Cherry SR; Meikle SR
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6207-6225. PubMed ID: 28475491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal whole-body PET scanner configurations for different volumes of LSO scintillator: a simulation study.
    Poon JK; Dahlbom ML; Moses WW; Balakrishnan K; Wang W; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(13):4077-94. PubMed ID: 22678106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.
    Yang Y; Bec J; Zhou J; Zhang M; Judenhofer MS; Bai X; Di K; Wu Y; Rodriguez M; Dokhale P; Shah KS; Farrell R; Qi J; Cherry SR
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 27013696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of long rectangular semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors.
    Zhang X; Wang X; Ren N; Hu B; Ding B; Kuang Z; Wu S; Sang Z; Hu Z; Du J; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1608-1619. PubMed ID: 30723932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design study of fully wearable high-performance brain PETs for neuroimaging in free movement.
    Tao W; Weng F; Chen G; Lv L; Zhao Z; Xie S; Zan Y; Xu J; Huang Q; Peng Q
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(13):135006. PubMed ID: 32325449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and performance of SIAT bPET: a high-resolution and high-sensitivity MR-compatible brain PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors.
    Kuang Z; Sang Z; Ren N; Wang X; Zeng T; Wu S; Niu M; Cong L; Kinyanjui SM; Chen Q; Tie C; Liu Z; Sun T; Hu Z; Du J; Li Y; Liang D; Liu X; Zheng H; Yang Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 Jan; 51(2):346-357. PubMed ID: 37782321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors.
    Watanabe M; Saito A; Isobe T; Ote K; Yamada R; Moriya T; Omura T
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):7148-7166. PubMed ID: 28753133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A count-rate model for PET scanners using pixelated Anger-logic detectors with different scintillators.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5697-715. PubMed ID: 16306662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. H
    Lai Y; Wang Q; Zhou S; Xie Z; Qi J; Cherry SR; Jin M; Chi Y; Du J
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065016. PubMed ID: 33571980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NEMA NU-4 performance evaluation of a non-human primate animal PET.
    Pei C; Baotong F; Zhiming Z; Haohui T; Shuangquan L; Xiaoli S; Peilin W; Xiaoming W; Xudong Z; Long W
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105018. PubMed ID: 30947155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The timing resolution of scintillation-detector systems: Monte Carlo analysis.
    Choong WS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6495-513. PubMed ID: 19820267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance evaluation of the MOLECUBES β-CUBE-a high spatial resolution and high sensitivity small animal PET scanner utilizing monolithic LYSO scintillation detectors.
    Krishnamoorthy S; Blankemeyer E; Mollet P; Surti S; Van Holen R; Karp JS
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155013. PubMed ID: 29938684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of inter-crystal scattering events on the performance of PET detectors.
    Zhang C; Sang Z; Wang X; Zhang X; Yang Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205004. PubMed ID: 31530747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.