These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31531552)

  • 1. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial.
    Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Barceleiro MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Sep; 33(0):e089. PubMed ID: 31531552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
    Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
    de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Hodges JS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1621-9. PubMed ID: 14719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veloso SRM; Lemos CAA; de Moraes SLD; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; Pellizzer EP; de Melo Monteiro GQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 29594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.
    Yousaf A; Aman N; Manzoor MA; Shah JA; Dilrasheed
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jun; 24(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 24953909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative Sensitivity of Composite Replacement of Amalgam Restoration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rodrigues NS; de Souza LC; Cunha DA; Souza NO; Silva P; Santiago SL; Loguercio AD; Silikas N; Saboia V
    Oper Dent; 2022 Sep; 47(5):481-491. PubMed ID: 36098547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
    Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Oz FD; Ergin E; Canatan S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180358. PubMed ID: 30994773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results.
    Colak H; Tokay U; Uzgur R; Hamidi MM; Ercan E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):822-831. PubMed ID: 28791976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of Class I and II Composite Resin Restorations Using a Sonic-resin Placement System.
    Kalmowicz J; Phebus JG; Owens BM; Johnson WW; King GT
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 26237636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.