These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31531811)

  • 1. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Internal Patient Satisfaction Scores at a Cancer Center With Star Ratings on Online Physician-Rating Websites.
    Kim C; Chisholm G; Bevolo A; Shelton B; Kian L; Lewis CM; Garcia EA; Weber RS; Frumovitz M
    JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1181-e1188. PubMed ID: 33760627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.
    Widmer RJ; Maurer MJ; Nayar VR; Aase LA; Wald JT; Kotsenas AL; Timimi FK; Harper CM; Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):453-457. PubMed ID: 29622095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
    Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There an Association Between Physician Review Websites and Press Ganey Survey Results in a Neurosurgical Outpatient Clinic?
    Rotman LE; Alford EN; Shank CD; Dalgo C; Stetler WR
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Dec; 132():e891-e899. PubMed ID: 31382063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings.
    Haffey SC; Hopman WM; Leveridge MJ
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():300. PubMed ID: 32733838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring integrated care.
    Strandberg-Larsen M
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Feb; 58(2):B4245. PubMed ID: 21299927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
    Gao GG; McCullough JS; Agarwal R; Jha AK
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Feb; 14(1):e38. PubMed ID: 22366336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.