These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31531896)

  • 1. SMARTp: A SMART design for nonsurgical treatments of chronic periodontitis with spatially referenced and nonrandomly missing skewed outcomes.
    Xu J; Bandyopadhyay D; Salehabadi SM; Michalowicz B; Chakraborty B
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):282-310. PubMed ID: 31531896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian set of best dynamic treatment regimes: Construction and sample size calculation for SMARTs with binary outcomes.
    Artman WJ; Johnson BA; Lynch KG; McKay JR; Ertefaie A
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1688-1708. PubMed ID: 35124836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and Analysis Considerations for Comparing Dynamic Treatment Regimens with Binary Outcomes from Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials.
    Kidwell KM; Seewald NJ; Tran Q; Kasari C; Almirall D
    J Appl Stat; 2018; 45():1628-1651. PubMed ID: 30555200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial skew-normal/independent models for nonrandomly missing clustered data.
    Bandyopadhyay D; Prates MO; Zhao X; Lachos VH
    Stat Med; 2021 Jun; 40(13):3085-3105. PubMed ID: 33782991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power analysis in a SMART design: sample size estimation for determining the best embedded dynamic treatment regime.
    Artman WJ; Nahum-Shani I; Wu T; Mckay JR; Ertefaie A
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):432-448. PubMed ID: 30380020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphical model for skewed matrix-variate non-randomly missing data.
    Zhang L; Bandyopadhyay D
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e80-e97. PubMed ID: 30371748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel approach to assess dynamic treatment regimes embedded in a SMART with an ordinal outcome.
    Ghosh P; Yan X; Chakraborty B
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(7):1096-1111. PubMed ID: 36726310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculation based on precision for pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART).
    Yan X; Ghosh P; Chakraborty B
    Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):247-271. PubMed ID: 32529788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes.
    Ertefaie A; Wu T; Lynch KG; Nahum-Shani I
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jan; 17(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 26243172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential multiple assignment randomization trials with enrichment design.
    Liu Y; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):378-390. PubMed ID: 27598622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive randomization in a two-stage sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.
    Wang J; Wu L; Wahed AS
    Biostatistics; 2022 Oct; 23(4):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 34052847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disease severity, debridement approach and timing of drug modify outcomes of adjunctive azithromycin in non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis: a multivariate meta-analysis.
    Jagannathan N; Acharya A; Yi Farn O; Li KY; Nibali L; Pelekos G
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):65. PubMed ID: 31029129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation for randomized trials via inverse probability of response weighting when outcome data are missing at random.
    Harrison LJ; Wang R
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1802-1821. PubMed ID: 36880120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of personalized Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) and Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) in mental health studies.
    Liu Y; Zeng D; Wang Y
    Shanghai Arch Psychiatry; 2014 Dec; 26(6):376-83. PubMed ID: 25642116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalized estimating equation model for binary outcomes with missing covariates.
    Xie F; Paik MC
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1458-66. PubMed ID: 9423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.
    Chen LW; Yavuz I; Cheng Y; Wahed AS
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e113-e130. PubMed ID: 30371745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV; Liu G
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):679-99. PubMed ID: 19051207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal two-stage dynamic treatment regimes from a classification perspective with censored survival data.
    Hager R; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1180-1192. PubMed ID: 29775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Clinical Periodontal Indices and Serum Interleukin-27 by One-stage Full-mouth Disinfection and Quadrant Scaling and Root Planing in Periodontitis.
    Babaloo A; Rahbar M; Babaloo Z; Ghasemi S; Amini A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):997-1004. PubMed ID: 30150504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reward ignorant modeling of dynamic treatment regimes.
    Wallace MP; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Biom J; 2018 Sep; 60(5):991-1002. PubMed ID: 29845644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.