These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31533067)

  • 1. Spatial confidence sets for raw effect size images.
    Bowring A; Telschow F; Schwartzman A; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116187. PubMed ID: 31533067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence Sets for Cohen's d effect size images.
    Bowring A; Telschow FJE; Schwartzman A; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117477. PubMed ID: 33166643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving effect size estimation and statistical power with multi-echo fMRI and its impact on understanding the neural systems supporting mentalizing.
    Lombardo MV; Auyeung B; Holt RJ; Waldman J; Ruigrok ANV; Mooney N; Bullmore ET; Baron-Cohen S; Kundu P
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():55-66. PubMed ID: 27417345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical power and prediction accuracy in multisite resting-state fMRI connectivity.
    Dansereau C; Benhajali Y; Risterucci C; Pich EM; Orban P; Arnold D; Bellec P
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():220-232. PubMed ID: 28161310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental design modulates variance in BOLD activation: The variance design general linear model.
    Gaut G; Li X; Lu ZL; Steyvers M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Sep; 40(13):3918-3929. PubMed ID: 31148301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data.
    Grady CL; Rieck JR; Nichol D; Rodrigue KM; Kennedy KM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jan; 42(1):204-219. PubMed ID: 32996635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MIDAS: Regionally linear multivariate discriminative statistical mapping.
    Varol E; Sotiras A; Davatzikos C
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():111-126. PubMed ID: 29524624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.
    Logan BR; Geliazkova MP; Rowe DB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1379-89. PubMed ID: 18064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional connectivity: studying nonlinear, delayed interactions between BOLD signals.
    Lahaye PJ; Poline JB; Flandin G; Dodel S; Garnero L
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):962-74. PubMed ID: 14568466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fMRI volume classification using a 3D convolutional neural network robust to shifted and scaled neuronal activations.
    Vu H; Kim HC; Jung M; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117328. PubMed ID: 32896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
    Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference and multiple testing correction in classification-based multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA): random permutations and cluster size control.
    Stelzer J; Chen Y; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():69-82. PubMed ID: 23041526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.
    Friston KJ; Holmes A; Poline JB; Price CJ; Frith CD
    Neuroimage; 1996 Dec; 4(3 Pt 1):223-35. PubMed ID: 9345513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative determination of concordance in localizing epileptic focus by component-based EEG-fMRI.
    Ebrahimzadeh E; Shams M; Fayaz F; Rajabion L; Mirbagheri M; Nadjar Araabi B; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():231-241. PubMed ID: 31319952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High spatial resolution BOLD fMRI using simultaneous multislice excitation with echo-shifting gradient echo at 7 Tesla.
    Su S; Lu N; Jia L; Long X; Jiang C; Zhang H; Li Y; Sun K; Xue R; Dharmakumar R; Zhang L; Liu X; Xie G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 66():86-92. PubMed ID: 30172939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measurements: quantification and implications for sample size.
    Zandbelt BB; Gladwin TE; Raemaekers M; van Buuren M; Neggers SF; Kahn RS; Ramsey NF; Vink M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 18538585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.