171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31533352)
1. Detection of Differentially Methylated Regions Using Bayes Factor for Ordinal Group Responses.
Dunbar F; Xu H; Ryu D; Ghosh S; Shi H; George V
Genes (Basel); 2019 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 31533352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational Methods for Detection of Differentially Methylated Regions Using Kernel Distance and Scan Statistics.
Dunbar F; Xu H; Ryu D; Ghosh S; Shi H; George V
Genes (Basel); 2019 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31013791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Bayesian hidden Markov model for detecting differentially methylated regions.
Ji T
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):663-673. PubMed ID: 30443900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hypomethylation coordinates antagonistically with hypermethylation in cancer development: a case study of leukemia.
Kushwaha G; Dozmorov M; Wren JD; Qiu J; Shi H; Xu D
Hum Genomics; 2016 Jul; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):18. PubMed ID: 27461342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian Approach for Analysis of Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing Data Identifies Disease-Associated Changes in DNA Methylation.
Rackham OJ; Langley SR; Oates T; Vradi E; Harmston N; Srivastava PK; Behmoaras J; Dellaportas P; Bottolo L; Petretto E
Genetics; 2017 Apr; 205(4):1443-1458. PubMed ID: 28213474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonparametric Bayesian clustering to detect bipolar methylated genomic loci.
Wu X; Sun MA; Zhu H; Xie H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 16():11. PubMed ID: 25592753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detect differentially methylated regions using non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for bisulfite sequencing data.
Chen Y; Kwok CK; Jiang H; Fan X
Methods; 2021 May; 189():34-43. PubMed ID: 32949692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epigenetic and genetic alterations and their influence on gene regulation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Huang D; Ovcharenko I
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):236. PubMed ID: 28302063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detect differentially methylated regions using non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for methylation array data.
Shen L; Zhu J; Robert Li SY; Fan X
Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 33(23):3701-3708. PubMed ID: 29036320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of differentially methylated regions in whole genome bisulfite sequencing data using local Getis-Ord statistics.
Wen Y; Chen F; Zhang Q; Zhuang Y; Li Z
Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(22):3396-3404. PubMed ID: 27493194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of genomic methylation status using methylation-specific and bisulfite sequencing polymerase chain reaction.
Carless MA
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1288():193-212. PubMed ID: 25827881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian hierarchical model to detect differentially methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data.
Feng H; Conneely KN; Wu H
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(8):e69. PubMed ID: 24561809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A full Bayesian partition model for identifying hypo- and hyper-methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data.
Wang H; He C; Kushwaha G; Xu D; Qiu J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):7. PubMed ID: 26818685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted bisulfite sequencing identified a panel of DNA methylation-based biomarkers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
Pu W; Wang C; Chen S; Zhao D; Zhou Y; Ma Y; Wang Y; Li C; Huang Z; Jin L; Guo S; Wang J; Wang M
Clin Epigenetics; 2017; 9():129. PubMed ID: 29270239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DMRFusion: A differentially methylated region detection tool based on the ranked fusion method.
Yassi M; Shams Davodly E; Mojtabanezhad Shariatpanahi A; Heidari M; Dayyani M; Heravi-Moussavi A; Moattar MH; Kerachian MA
Genomics; 2018 Nov; 110(6):366-374. PubMed ID: 29309841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of functionally methylated regions based on discriminant analysis through integrating methylation and gene expression data.
Zhang Y; Zhang J
Mol Biosyst; 2015 Jul; 11(7):1786-93. PubMed ID: 25865601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global DNA methylation profiling reveals new insights into epigenetically deregulated protein coding and long noncoding RNAs in CLL.
Subhash S; Andersson PO; Kosalai ST; Kanduri C; Kanduri M
Clin Epigenetics; 2016; 8():106. PubMed ID: 27777635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias.
Nair SS; Coolen MW; Stirzaker C; Song JZ; Statham AL; Strbenac D; Robinson MD; Clark SJ
Epigenetics; 2011 Jan; 6(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 20818161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of methylated regions with peak search based on Poisson model from massively parallel methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-sequencing data.
Yang Y; Wang W; Li Y; Tu J; Bai Y; Xiao P; Zhang D; Lu Z
Electrophoresis; 2010 Oct; 31(21):3537-44. PubMed ID: 20925052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Both hypomethylation and hypermethylation in a 0.2-kb region of a DNA repeat in cancer.
Nishiyama R; Qi L; Lacey M; Ehrlich M
Mol Cancer Res; 2005 Nov; 3(11):617-26. PubMed ID: 16317087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
