BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31533516)

  • 1. Readmissions After Lobectomy in an Era of Increasing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Statewide Analysis.
    Hendriksen BS; Reed MF; Taylor MD; Hollenbeak CS
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):453-462. PubMed ID: 31533516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utilization Trends, Outcomes, and Cost in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.
    Subramanian MP; Liu J; Chapman WC; Olsen MA; Yan Y; Liu Y; Semenkovich TR; Meyers BF; Puri V; Kozower BD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 108(6):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 31400324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Lobectomy Modality and Other Predictors of Conversion to Thoracotomy.
    Hendriksen BS; Hollenbeak CS; Taylor MD; Reed MF
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Aug; 14(4):342-352. PubMed ID: 31099278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-Term Readmissions After Open, Thoracoscopic, and Robotic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Based on the Nationwide Readmissions Database.
    Bailey KL; Merchant N; Seo YJ; Elashoff D; Benharash P; Yanagawa J
    World J Surg; 2019 May; 43(5):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 30603764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.
    Kneuertz PJ; Singer E; D'Souza DM; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2018-2026.e2. PubMed ID: 30819575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Ricciardi R; Goldstone RN; Francone T; Wszolek M; Auchincloss H; de Groot A; Shih IF; Li Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7549-7560. PubMed ID: 35445834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach.
    Aiolfi A; Nosotti M; Micheletto G; Khor D; Bonitta G; Perali C; Marin J; Biraghi T; Bona D
    Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 33097244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.
    Andersson SE; Ilonen IK; Pälli OH; Salo JA; Räsänen JV
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 27():100362. PubMed ID: 33838571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence and risk factors for 90-day hospital readmission following video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection†.
    Konstantinidis K; Woodcock-Shaw J; Dinesh P; Brunelli A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Apr; 55(4):666-672. PubMed ID: 30364954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of hospital volume of thoracoscopic lobectomy on primary lung cancer outcomes.
    Park HS; Detterbeck FC; Boffa DJ; Kim AW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Feb; 93(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 21945225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy.
    Yang HX; Woo KM; Sima CS; Bains MS; Adusumilli PS; Huang J; Finley DJ; Rizk NP; Rusch VW; Jones DR; Park BJ
    Ann Surg; 2017 Feb; 265(2):431-437. PubMed ID: 28059973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting.
    Augustin F; Bodner J; Maier H; Schwinghammer C; Pichler B; Lucciarini P; Pratschke J; Schmid T
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2013 Aug; 398(6):895-901. PubMed ID: 23754154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Switching from Thoracoscopic to Robotic Platform for Lobectomy: Report of Learning Curve and Outcome.
    Lee EC; Lazzaro RS; Glassman LR; Singh VA; Jurado JE; Hyman KM; Patton BD; Zeltsman D; Scheinerman JS; Hartman AR; Lee PC
    Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 32228219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Hu X; Wang M
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2019; 22(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 30973106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Discharge Does Not Increase Readmission Rates After Minimally Invasive Anatomic Lung Resection.
    Chevrollier GS; Nemecz AK; Devin C; Go KV; Yi M; Keith SW; Cowan SW; Evans NR
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Jun; 14(3):218-226. PubMed ID: 30871400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.
    Louie BE; Wilson JL; Kim S; Cerfolio RJ; Park BJ; Farivar AS; Vallières E; Aye RW; Burfeind WR; Block MI
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Sep; 102(3):917-924. PubMed ID: 27209613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in Hospital Adoption Rates of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer and the Effect on Outcomes.
    Abdelsattar ZM; Allen MS; Shen KR; Cassivi SD; Nichols FC; Wigle DA; Blackmon SH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Feb; 103(2):454-460. PubMed ID: 27825690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Data Base.
    Yang CF; Sun Z; Speicher PJ; Saud SM; Gulack BC; Hartwig MG; Harpole DH; Onaitis MW; Tong BC; D'Amico TA; Berry MF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1037-42. PubMed ID: 26822346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States.
    Alwatari Y; Khoraki J; Wolfe LG; Ramamoorthy B; Wall N; Liu C; Julliard W; Puig CA; Shah RD
    JTCVS Open; 2022 Dec; 12():385-398. PubMed ID: 36590738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
    Kneuertz PJ; Cheufou DH; D'Souza DM; Mardanzai K; Abdel-Rasoul M; Theegarten D; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Aigner C; Merritt RE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Nov; 158(5):1457-1466.e2. PubMed ID: 31623811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.