696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31534211)
1. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.
Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM
Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).
Riggs ER; Andersen EF; Cherry AM; Kantarci S; Kearney H; Patel A; Raca G; Ritter DI; South ST; Thorland EC; Pineda-Alvarez D; Aradhya S; Martin CL
Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):245-257. PubMed ID: 31690835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants.
Lee K; Krempely K; Roberts ME; Anderson MJ; Carneiro F; Chao E; Dixon K; Figueiredo J; Ghosh R; Huntsman D; Kaurah P; Kesserwan C; Landrith T; Li S; Mensenkamp AR; Oliveira C; Pardo C; Pesaran T; Richardson M; Slavin TP; Spurdle AB; Trapp M; Witkowski L; Yi CS; Zhang L; Plon SE; Schrader KA; Karam R
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1553-1568. PubMed ID: 30311375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Interpretation of Sequence Variants.
Zhang J; Yao Y; He H; Shen J
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2020 Jun; 106(1):e98. PubMed ID: 32176464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.
Tavtigian SV; Greenblatt MS; Harrison SM; Nussbaum RL; Prabhu SA; Boucher KM; Biesecker LG;
Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 29300386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.
Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert specification of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for genetic hearing loss.
Oza AM; DiStefano MT; Hemphill SE; Cushman BJ; Grant AR; Siegert RK; Shen J; Chapin A; Boczek NJ; Schimmenti LA; Murry JB; Hasadsri L; Nara K; Kenna M; Booth KT; Azaiez H; Griffith A; Avraham KB; Kremer H; Rehm HL; Amr SS; Abou Tayoun AN;
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1593-1613. PubMed ID: 30311386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion.
Abou Tayoun AN; Pesaran T; DiStefano MT; Oza A; Rehm HL; Biesecker LG; Harrison SM;
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 30192042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria.
Nykamp K; Anderson M; Powers M; Garcia J; Herrera B; Ho YY; Kobayashi Y; Patil N; Thusberg J; Westbrook M; ; Topper S
Genet Med; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1105-1117. PubMed ID: 28492532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the potential of functional evidence to reclassify variants of uncertain significance in the categorical and Bayesian interpretation frameworks.
Brnich SE; Rivera-Muñoz EA; Berg JS
Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1531-1541. PubMed ID: 30095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Richards S; Aziz N; Bale S; Bick D; Das S; Gastier-Foster J; Grody WW; Hegde M; Lyon E; Spector E; Voelkerding K; Rehm HL;
Genet Med; 2015 May; 17(5):405-24. PubMed ID: 25741868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consideration of Cosegregation in the Pathogenicity Classification of Genomic Variants.
Jarvik GP; Browning BL
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 27236918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Navigating the nuances of clinical sequence variant interpretation in Mendelian disease.
Strande NT; Brnich SE; Roman TS; Berg JS
Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):918-926. PubMed ID: 29988079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adapting the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework: A perspective from the ClinGen Hemoglobinopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.
Kountouris P; Stephanou C; Lederer CW; Traeger-Synodinos J; Bento C; Harteveld CL; Fylaktou E; Koopmann TT; Halim-Fikri H; Michailidou K; Nfonsam LE; Waye JS; Zilfalil BA; Kleanthous M;
Hum Mutat; 2022 Aug; 43(8):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 34510646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants.
Hoskinson DC; Dubuc AM; Mason-Suares H
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2017 Feb; 42():33-39. PubMed ID: 28157586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The updates of the ACMG variant interpretation guidelines affect the pathogenicity determination of
Wu KL; Li J; Wang HY; Wang QJ
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 59(5):455-463. PubMed ID: 38811176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ClinGen's RASopathy Expert Panel consensus methods for variant interpretation.
Gelb BD; Cavé H; Dillon MW; Gripp KW; Lee JA; Mason-Suares H; Rauen KA; Williams B; Zenker M; Vincent LM;
Genet Med; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 29493581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A large-scale retrospective analysis of copy number variations in single center using ACMG-ClinGen latest guidelines].
Zhang Y; Xue J; Yan L; Liu Y; Zhuang D; Xie M; Chen Y; An Y; Shen Y; Li H
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 39(8):814-818. PubMed ID: 35929928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Genetic Testing in Hereditary Cancer by RNA Analysis: Tools to Prioritize Splicing Studies and Challenges in Applying American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Guidelines.
Rofes P; Menéndez M; González S; Tornero E; Gómez C; Vargas-Parra G; Montes E; Salinas M; Solanes A; Brunet J; Teulé A; Capellá G; Feliubadaló L; Del Valle J; Pineda M; Lázaro C
J Mol Diagn; 2020 Dec; 22(12):1453-1468. PubMed ID: 33011440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]