These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31534286)

  • 1. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multilevel Modeling of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment: The Multilevel DINA Example.
    Wang WC; Qiu XL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 30573933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Sequential Higher Order Latent Structural Model for Hierarchical Attributes in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Zhan P; Ma W; Jiao H; Ding S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 31853159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.
    Hong H; Wang C; Lim YS; Douglas J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 29880992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Potential for Interpretational Confounding in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Huang QH; Bolt DM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):303-320. PubMed ID: 35601265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):465-479. PubMed ID: 29881019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generic Identifiability of the DINA Model and Blessing of Latent Dependence.
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):117-131. PubMed ID: 36167947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.
    Kaya Y; Leite WL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 77(3):369-388. PubMed ID: 29795918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Liang L; Lu J; Zhang J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889673. PubMed ID: 35769736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.
    Yigit HD; Douglas JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):143-158. PubMed ID: 33958833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.