These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31535097)

  • 1. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
    Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
    Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
    Esposito M; Cannizarro G; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Buti J; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 31116188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
    Esposito M; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 21594216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading.
    Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Checchi V; Marchetti C; Pellegrino G; Censi P; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 20467615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Felice P; Karatzopoulos G; Worthington HV; Coulthard P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2009; 2(3):167-84. PubMed ID: 20467628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 30515480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Felice P; Pellegrino G; Checchi L; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1394-403. PubMed ID: 20678136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.