These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3153635)

  • 1. [Pulpal reaction after the use of a glass ionomer cement as a cavity liner. An experimental study].
    Karanika-Kouma A; Trigonidis G
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1987; 31(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 3153635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experimental study of the effect of a photopolymerizable glass ionomer cavity liner on pulp pressure and temperature].
    Deux D; Bonin P; Boivin R; Poulard J
    Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Sep; 9(3):25-30. PubMed ID: 2236735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulp reactions to light-cured glass ionomer cements.
    Gaintantzopoulou MD; Willis GP; Kafrawy AH
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 9115678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histopathological investigation of the effects of various glass-ionomer cements on dental pulp.
    Tarim B; Yücel T; Alatli C; Acar E; Olgaç V
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):429-33. PubMed ID: 9582626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.
    Hosoda H; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Harnirattisai C; Otsuki M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 1805180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological investigation of the effects of new type improved glass ionomer cements over pulp.
    Eronat C; Eronat N
    Dent; 1987 May; 2(4):156-66. PubMed ID: 3476259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pulp toxicity of luting cements].
    Grund P; Raab WH
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):736-9. PubMed ID: 2269096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulpal reaction to IRM cement: an intermediate restorative material containing eugenol.
    Brännström M; Nordenvall KJ; Torstenson B
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1981; 48(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 6944322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A histopathological study of pulp response to 3 kinds of tannin-fluoride cement in cavities in dogs].
    Tsujimura I
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1983 Jul; 83(7):891-935. PubMed ID: 6580745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulp reaction to a tri-cure resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Demirci M; Uçok M; Küçükkeleş N; Soydan N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jun; 85(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 9638706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulpal responses to two luting cements.
    Valcke CF; Cleaton-Jones PE; Austin JC; Forbes M; Sam C
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):858-62. PubMed ID: 6964197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A rationale for use of bases with amalgam restorations.
    Bartlett DW
    Dent Update; 1992 Dec; 19(10):413-4, 416-7. PubMed ID: 1303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
    Beer R; Gängler P; Wutzler P; Krehan F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 2257828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulpal effects of nuva seal on dogs' teeth.
    Goto G; Machida Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1976 Feb; 17(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 1076062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pulpal and dentinal responses to glass ionomer cement].
    Miani C; Sacchi A; Boari A
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(4):677-81. PubMed ID: 6593587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.