These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3153635)
21. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping. Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement. Histological study in dogs. Holland Junior C; Takayama S; Russo M; Komatsu J; Sasaki T; Quintella LP Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1978; 7(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 297972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth. Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of a dentin barrier test by cyctotoxicity testing of various dental cements. Schmalz G; Schweikl H; Esch J; Hiller KA J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):112-5. PubMed ID: 8618090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of zinc oxide and eugenol as cavity liner--a literature review. Kundu PN J Indian Dent Assoc; 1967 Sep; 39(9):139-40. PubMed ID: 5236655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations. Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biological and clinical investigations of a glass ionomer base material. Schmalz G; Thonemann B; Riedel M; Elderton RJ Dent Mater; 1994 Sep; 10(5):304-13. PubMed ID: 7498591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Glass-ionomer cements. Part 4. Clinical properties III. Lynch E; Tay WM J Ir Dent Assoc; 1989 Jun; 35(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 2487316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide/eugenol cement. Brännström M; Nyborg H J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Feb; 35(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 1061813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dental cements: an update. Jones DW J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):569-70. PubMed ID: 9785686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Sensitivity study in vivo: glass-ionomer versus zinc-phosphate bases beneath amalgam restorations. Scherer W; Cooper H; Kaim J; Hittleman E; Staffa J Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):193-6. PubMed ID: 2098729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Dentin protecting dressings and their tightness]. Mayer R Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jun; 42(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 3483743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [The irritant effect of plastic filling materials on the dental pulp]. Götze W Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):486-8. PubMed ID: 6773734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements via pulpal response. Norman RD; Wright JS Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1986 Jan; 7(1):41-3, 46-7. PubMed ID: 3457687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]