These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31536414)

  • 1. Public Health Research Priorities to Address Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in the United States.
    Atkinson HG; Ottenheimer D; Mishori R
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Nov; 109(11):1523-1527. PubMed ID: 31536414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012.
    Goldberg H; Stupp P; Okoroh E; Besera G; Goodman D; Danel I
    Public Health Rep; 2016; 131(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 26957669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland.
    Van Baelen L; Ortensi L; Leye E
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Dec; 21(6):474-482. PubMed ID: 27652839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.
    Zurynski Y; Sureshkumar P; Phu A; Elliott E
    BMC Int Health Hum Rights; 2015 Dec; 15():32. PubMed ID: 26652275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the indirect prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in Switzerland.
    Cottler-Casanova S; Abdulcadir J
    BMC Public Health; 2021 May; 21(1):1011. PubMed ID: 34051758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.
    Dorkenoo E
    World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9050193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender equality and human rights approaches to female genital mutilation: a review of international human rights norms and standards.
    Khosla R; Banerjee J; Chou D; Say L; Fried ST
    Reprod Health; 2017 May; 14(1):59. PubMed ID: 28499386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Words Matter: Charting the Landscape of US and International Health Profession Organizations' Public Statements About FGM/C.
    Choudhary I; Mishori R; Kim S
    J Immigr Minor Health; 2019 Aug; 21(4):893-904. PubMed ID: 30173380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes and Experiences Surrounding Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: A Scoping Review.
    Besera G; Goldberg H; Okoroh EM; Snead MC; Johnson-Agbakwu CE; Goodwin MM
    J Immigr Minor Health; 2023 Apr; 25(2):449-482. PubMed ID: 36542264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring young people's interpretations of female genital mutilation in the UK using a community-based participatory research approach.
    Ali S; de Viggiani N; Abzhaparova A; Salmon D; Gray S
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):1132. PubMed ID: 32689963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploration of attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in men and women accessing FGM clinical services in London: a pilot study.
    Larsson M; Cohen P; Hann G; Creighton SM; Hodes D
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Oct; 38(7):1005-1009. PubMed ID: 29560774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debating medicalization of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): learning from (policy) experiences across countries.
    Leye E; Van Eekert N; Shamu S; Esho T; Barrett H;
    Reprod Health; 2019 Nov; 16(1):158. PubMed ID: 31675972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the magnitude of female genital mutilation/cutting in Norway: an extrapolation model.
    Ziyada MM; Norberg-Schulz M; Johansen REB
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Feb; 16():110. PubMed ID: 26837303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in Girls.
    Young J; Nour NM; Macauley RC; Narang SK; Johnson-Agbakwu C; ; ;
    Pediatrics; 2020 Aug; 146(2):. PubMed ID: 32719089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the prevalence of female genital mutilation in Portugal.
    Teixeira AL; Lisboa M
    Public Health; 2016 Oct; 139():53-60. PubMed ID: 27267250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. United to end female genital mutilation: an on line knowledge platform for professionals and public.
    Kouta C; Kofou E; Kaili C
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Jun; 25(3):235-239. PubMed ID: 32312123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among Women of Somali and Kurdish Origin in Finland.
    Koukkula M; Keskimäki I; Koponen P; Mölsä M; Klemetti R
    Birth; 2016 Sep; 43(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 27157533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the reliability and validity of attitudes and confidence scales for the care of women and girls affected by female genital mutilation/cutting.
    Marea CX; Warren N; Glass N; Johnson-Agbakwu C; Perrin N
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):1415. PubMed ID: 34273951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female genital mutilation/cutting: Emerging factors sustaining medicalization related changes in selected Kenyan communities.
    Kimani S; Kabiru CW; Muteshi J; Guyo J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228410. PubMed ID: 32119680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Female genital mutilation in the UK: considerations for best nursing practice.
    Rose B
    Br J Nurs; 2019 Jun; 28(12):788-791. PubMed ID: 31242117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.