These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31536853)

  • 21. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Turkish population.
    Karakoc O; Akcam T; Birkent H; Arslan HH; Gerek M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 23524731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Nasalance Scores for Normal Speakers of American English Obtained by the Nasometer II Using the MacKay-Kummer SNAP-R Test.
    Alfwaress F; Kummer AW; Weinrich B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Jun; 59(6):765-773. PubMed ID: 34184583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nasometer 6200 Versus Nasometer II 6400: Effect on Measures of Nasalance.
    Awan SN; Virani A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2013 May; 50(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 22906390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Normative Nasalance Scores for Middle-Aged and Elderly Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
    Marino VCC; Cardoso VM; de Boer G; Dutka JCR; Fabbron EMG; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(2):82-89. PubMed ID: 30041244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
    Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normative Data and Dialectical Effects on Nasalance in Flemish Adults.
    D'haeseleer E; Bettens K; De Mets S; De Moor V; Van Lierde K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2015; 67(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 25998177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores.
    Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of Voice Focus on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese.
    de Boer G; Marino VC; Berti LC; Fabron EM; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2016; 68(3):152-158. PubMed ID: 27923221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating Nasalance Values Among Bilingual Mandarin-English Speakers.
    Pua E; Holt Y; Kollara L; Rangarathnam B; Fang X; Perry JL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Apr; 56(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 30099917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nasalance score variation in normal adult Japanese speakers of Mid-West Japanese dialect.
    Tachimura T; Mori C; Hirata SI; Wada T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Sep; 37(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 11034028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nasalance scores of Brazilian Portuguese speakers at 5 years of age.
    Oliveira DN; Sampaio-Teixeira ACM; Alvarenga BG; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP; Trindade IEK
    Codas; 2017 May; 29(3):e20160197. PubMed ID: 28538832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normative nasalance scores for the Malay language.
    Ibrahim HM; Reilly S; Kilpatrick N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Sep; 49(5):e61-3. PubMed ID: 21787239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Normative nasalance scores in Chilean adults.
    Inostroza-Allende F; Palomares-Aguilera M; Jara MG; Gaponov CQ; Villarroel CG; Pegoraro-Krook MI
    Codas; 2022; 34(6):e20210152. PubMed ID: 35352792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nasalance in Arabic-Speaking Jordanians: A Comparative Study.
    Odeh OM; Madison CL; Riski JE
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2020; 72(5):370-377. PubMed ID: 31505489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study.
    Awan SN; Bressmann T; Poburka B; Roy N; Sharp H; Watts C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25260176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nasalance measures in German-speaking cleft patients.
    Swennen GR; Grimaldi H; Upheber J; Kramer FJ; Dempf R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):158-64; discussion 164. PubMed ID: 14704583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NASALANCE SCORES IN LEBANESE ENGLISH-SPEAKING ADULTS USING NASOMETRIC ANALYSIS.
    Hamdan AL; Ziade G; Jabbour J; Khneizer G; Kutkut I
    J Med Liban; 2015; 63(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 26821403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults.
    Bettens K; Wuyts FL; Jonckheere L; Platbrood S; Van Lierde K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Oct; 42(3):133-140. PubMed ID: 27841710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.