These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31537110)
1. Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study. de Boer G; Marino VCC; Dutka JCR; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Bressmann T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 Apr; 57(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 31537110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Application of a New Approach to Identify Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Based on Nasalance Scores. Bettens K; de Boer G; Bressmann T; Bruneel L; Van Lierde K Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 May; 56(5):628-638. PubMed ID: 30134743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners: Methodological Issue. Naderi M; Sabour S Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 Oct; 57(10):1247-1248. PubMed ID: 32705881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Response to "Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners: Methodological Issue". de Boer G; Marino VCC; Dutka JCR; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Bressmann T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 Oct; 57(10):1249-1250. PubMed ID: 32705885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings. Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model. Bunton K; Story BH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Nov; 49(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 21970695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality. Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application. Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Sinko K; Gruber M; Jagsch R; Roesner I; Baumann A; Wutzl A; Denk-Linnert DM Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 274(7):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 28299425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of nasal port area on perception of nasality and measures of nasalance based on computational modeling. Bunton K Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Jan; 52(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 24437587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of perceptual evaluation for resonance disorders to nasalance scores in children with cleft palate. Prathanee B; Pumnum T; Seepuaham C J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95 Suppl 11():S100-5. PubMed ID: 23961628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of regional dialect on oral-nasal balance and nasality perception. Velik K; Bae Y; Fox RA Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(7):587-600. PubMed ID: 30646769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores. Santoni C; Thaut M; Bressmann T Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 135():110107. PubMed ID: 32480137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop. Bruneel L; Alighieri C; D'haeseleer E; Kissel I; Adriaansen A; Sseremba D; Van Lierde K Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110191. PubMed ID: 32593063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Adult Naïve Listeners Perceive Differences in Speech Before and After Therapy for Cleft Palate Speech Disorders? A Reliability Study of Perceptual Speech Ratings. Alighieri C; Meerschaert S; Van Lierde K J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):116-125. PubMed ID: 37992413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in nasalance and nasality perception between Texas South and Midland dialects. Bae Y; Lee SAS; Velik K; Liu Y; Beck C; Fox RA J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):568. PubMed ID: 32007026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use. Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency. Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of linear discriminant analysis to the nasometric assessment of resonance disorders: a pilot study. de Boer G; Bressmann T Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Mar; 52(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 25714268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]