124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31537483)
1. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the United States: Institutional variations and predictive factors.
Pooli A; Salmasi A; Johnson DC; Lenis AT; Faiena I; Lebacle C; Golla V; Drakaki A; Gollapudi K; Blumberg J; Pantuck AJ; Chamie K
Urol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1.e17-1.e23. PubMed ID: 31537483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer.
Tan WS; Krimphove MJ; Cole AP; Marchese M; Berg S; Lipsitz SR; Löppenberg B; Nabi J; Abdollah F; Choueiri TK; Kibel AS; Sooriakumaran P; Trinh QD
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e1060-e1068. PubMed ID: 31303561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated Costs Associated With Radiation Therapy for Positive Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy.
Martini A; Marqueen KE; Falagario UG; Waingankar N; Wajswol E; Khan F; Fossati N; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Tewari AK; Stock R; Rastinehad AR
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e201913. PubMed ID: 32232450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive Association between Preoperative Total Testosterone Levels and Risk of Positive Surgical Margins by Prostate Cancer: Results in 476 Consecutive Patients Treated Only by Radical Prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Pocessali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Brunelli M; Iacovelli R; Romano M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29975957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Does body habitus really make a difference ?
Albisinni S; Grosman J; Aoun F; Quackels T; Peltier A; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):434-441. PubMed ID: 29789234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Mazzone E; Knipper S; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Shariat SF; Tian Z; Saad F; Montorsi F; Zorn KC; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e130-e139. PubMed ID: 30366880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.
Antonelli A; Sodano M; Peroni A; Mittino I; Palumbo C; Furlan M; Carobbio F; Tardanico R; Fisogni S; Simeone C
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 28009146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.
Tallman JE; Packiam VT; Wroblewski KE; Paner GP; Eggener SE
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):461.e1-461.e6. PubMed ID: 28302349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors associated with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: can nerve-sparing surgery increase the risk?
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Christensen IJ; Toft BG; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Feb; 48(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 23181451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.
Evans SM; Millar JL; Frydenberg M; Murphy DG; Davis ID; Spelman T; Bolton DM; Giles GG; Dean J; Costello AJ; Frauman AG; Kearns PA; Day L; Daniels C; McNeill JJ
BJU Int; 2014 Nov; 114(5):680-90. PubMed ID: 24128010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
