These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3153834)

  • 1. [Current status of automatic refractometry].
    Bonnet JL
    Ophtalmologie; 1987; 1(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 3153834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic objective refraction. Report of a clinical trial.
    Safir A; Knoll H; Mohrman R
    Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1970; 74(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 5493411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The AP-94 device for examination of ocular refraction].
    Volkov BP; Ponkratov AN; Skvortsov IuS; Tregub VP; Shmidt ER
    Med Tekh; 1997; (1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9148079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures].
    Poletti J; Courrejou C
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Borish nearpoint chart.
    Borish IM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Jan; 49(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 624826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the performance of an automatic objective refractometer on 3,618 eyes].
    Dufier JL; Abitbol M; Pigamo F; Prete T; Paris JP; Poitrenaud O
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1987; 10(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 3305678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The clinical trial of a prototype of the new LAR-2 serially produced laser optometer].
    Rozenblium IuZ; Avetisov VE; Maksudova ZN
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1993; 109(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 8279102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparative study between subjective and objective refraction using the Autorefractor 6600 on 200 eyes in children].
    Menerath JM; Michel M; Dalens H; Rigal D
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1189-93. PubMed ID: 6679825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Basic manual lensometry: a guide for measuring distance and near glasses.
    Garber N
    J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 2000; 19(4):184-91; quiz 192-3. PubMed ID: 11309995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical evaluation of the Dioptron II Ultima B].
    Risse JF; Villard C; Carre H
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 6679824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the Cavitron Autorefractor 7 with contact lenses and non contact lens wearing patients.
    Koetting RA; Akerman DH; Koetting RR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 6841865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of refractive techniques.
    McKendrick AM; Brennan NA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Dec; 66(12):758-65. PubMed ID: 8557954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device.
    Dyson C
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jan; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 849538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated refraction in aphakia--1. Its accuracy and repeatability compared to a single-practitioner conventional technique.
    Guillon M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1981; 1(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 7342010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphical analysis of accommodation-convergence relationships.
    Wallis NE
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1966; 23(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 5982446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The subordination of refraction.
    Goss DA; Penisten DK
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):580-2. PubMed ID: 8942129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Automatic refractometry, reliability of the determination of type and degree of refraction anomalies].
    Kovacić Z; Ivanisević M; Plestina-Borjan I; Capkun V
    Lijec Vjesn; 1998 Jun; 120(6):162-4. PubMed ID: 9819515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Guide line for the programmed determination of refraction].
    Grimm W; Trier HG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1972 Sep; 161(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 4647525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?".
    Borish IM; Catania LJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An historical review of optometric principles and techniques.
    Bennett AG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 3520440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.