These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31538456)

  • 1. Fit evaluation of cad/cam fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization
    Arcuri L; Lorenzi C; Bianchi N; Marchetti E; Barlattani A
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2019; 33(3 Suppl. 1):103-111. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT. PubMed ID: 31538456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions: A systematic review.
    Turkyilmaz I; Benli M; Yun S
    Prim Dent J; 2023 Mar; 12(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 36916623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsirogiannis P; Reissmann DR; Heydecke G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):328-335.e2. PubMed ID: 27061627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review.
    Memari Y; Mohajerfar M; Armin A; Kamalian F; Rezayani V; Beyabanaki E
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e536-e544. PubMed ID: 29679423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of half-digital workflows on the adaptation of custom CAD-CAM composite post-and-cores.
    Perucelli F; Goulart da Costa R; Machado de Souza E; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):756-762. PubMed ID: 33127081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
    Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of single-unit ceramic crown fabrication after digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manisha J; Srivastava G; Das SS; Tabarak N; Choudhury GK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37102534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?
    Kauling AEC; Keul C; Erdelt K; Kühnisch J; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Oct; 23(10):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 30725188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.