These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31538953)

  • 21. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma.
    Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
    Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
    Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability.
    Fares MY; Singh J; Vadhera AS; Koa J; Boufadel P; Abboud JA
    Clin Shoulder Elb; 2023 Sep; 26(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 37607858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the readability, understandability, and quality of online materials about chest pain in children.
    Arslan D; Tutar MS; Kozanhan B
    Eur J Pediatr; 2020 Dec; 179(12):1881-1891. PubMed ID: 32894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.
    Alpaydın MT; Buyuk SK; Canigur Bavbek N
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct; 83(Suppl 1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34269827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
    Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
    Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High tibial osteotomy: A review of the readability and quality of patient information on the internet.
    Clark M; Baxter IC; Hampton M; Sandler RD; Legg A
    Health Promot Perspect; 2021; 11(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 34660227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
    Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
    JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the readability and visual appearance of online patient resources for fibroadenoma.
    Hutchings HA; Remesh A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277823. PubMed ID: 36399450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Knee osteotomy: Quality tools and readability data of information on the internet.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Data Brief; 2021 Feb; 34():106624. PubMed ID: 33354604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
    Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
    Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis.
    Ko TK; Tan DJY; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e55535. PubMed ID: 39145998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality and readability of online information on plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spur.
    Kaya E; Görmez S
    Rheumatol Int; 2022 Nov; 42(11):1965-1972. PubMed ID: 35763090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.