167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31541536)
1. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):160-171. PubMed ID: 31541536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the ray-casting analytical algorithm for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Winterhalter C; Zepter S; Shim S; Meier G; Bolsi A; Fredh A; Hrbacek J; Oxley D; Zhang Y; Weber DC; Lomax A; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065021. PubMed ID: 30641496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental assessment of proton dose calculation accuracy in inhomogeneous media.
Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Orban de Xivry J; Lee JA; Traneus E; Souris K; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Phys Med; 2017 Jun; 38():10-15. PubMed ID: 28610689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer.
Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P
Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive step size algorithm to increase efficiency of proton macro Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Kueng R; Frei D; Volken W; Stuermlin F; M Stampanoni MF; Aebersold DM; Manser P; Fix MK
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Sep; 14(1):165. PubMed ID: 31500647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons.
Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of newly implemented dose calculation algorithms for multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife tumor-tracking radiotherapy.
Kawata K; Kamomae T; Oguchi H; Kawabata F; Okudaira K; Kawamura M; Ohtakara K; Itoh Y; Naganawa S
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 31913508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Monaco treatment planning system algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation for small fields in anthropomorphic RANDO phantom: The esophagus case.
Tugrul T
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 34916367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy.
Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental benchmarking of RayStation proton dose calculation algorithms inside and outside the target region in heterogeneous phantom geometries.
Ruangchan S; Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Georg D; Clausen M
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():182-193. PubMed ID: 32693355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the analytical irradiator model and Monte Carlo dose engine in the small animal irradiation treatment planning system µ-RayStation 8B.
Chiavassa S; Nilsson R; Clément-Colmou K; Potiron V; Delpon G; Traneus E
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(3):035006. PubMed ID: 31829982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
