These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31541632)
1. Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Carroll PA; Jacob N; Yeung JC; Darling GE Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Feb; 109(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 31541632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre. Sihag S; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Lanuti M; Allan JS; Mathisen DJ; Morse CR Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Sep; 42(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 22345284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches. Weksler B; Sullivan JL Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy. Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown. Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan. Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy. Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study. Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the short-term clinical outcome between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy by comprehensive complication index. Ma G; Cao H; Wei R; Qu X; Wang L; Zhu L; Du J; Wang Y J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(4):789-794. PubMed ID: 29970654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transthoracic approach is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation after esophageal resection. Lohani KR; Nandipati KC; Rollins SE; Fetten K; Lee TH; Pallati PK; Yamamoto SR; Mittal SK Surg Endosc; 2015 Jul; 29(7):2039-45. PubMed ID: 25361647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy). Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]