330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31542089)
1. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study.
Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phenotype to genotype characterization by array-comparative genomic hydridization (a-CGH) in case of fetal malformations: A systematic review.
Tonni G; Palmisano M; Perez Zamarian AC; Rabachini Caetano AC; Santana EFM; Peixoto AB; Armbruster-Moraes E; Ruano R; Araujo Júnior E
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 30638470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal Diagnosis of 4q Terminal Deletion and Review of the Literature.
Tidrenczel Z; Tardy EP; Pikó H; Sarkadi E; Böjtös I; Demeter J; Simon J; Kósa JP; Beke A
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2019; 158(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 31261151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Applied research of combined G-banding and array-CGH in the prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonographic abnormalities in fetuses].
Fu W; Lu J; Xu L; Zheng L; Zhang Y; Zhong Y; Wang Y; Jin Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 31(6):737-42. PubMed ID: 25449078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype: a follow-up study of 100 cases supplemented with CGH and MLPA analyses.
Schou KV; Kirchhoff M; Nygaard U; Jørgensen C; Sundberg K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19953565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal diagnosis of de novo monosomy 18p deletion syndrome by chromosome microarray analysis: Three case reports.
Qi H; Zhu J; Zhang S; Cai L; Wen X; Zeng W; Tang G; Luo Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15027. PubMed ID: 30946338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of chromosomal karyotyping analysis and array CGH for fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonography].
Wang Y; Tang B; Guo L; Chen H; Lu J; Yin A
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 34(4):550-553. PubMed ID: 28777857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. De novo monosomy 9p24.3-pter and trisomy 17q24.3-qter characterised by microarray comparative genomic hybridisation in a fetus with an increased nuchal translucency.
Brisset S; Kasakyan S; L'Herminé AC; Mairovitz V; Gautier E; Aubry MC; Benkhalifa M; Tachdjian G
Prenat Diagn; 2006 Mar; 26(3):206-13. PubMed ID: 16450348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high-resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency.
Law LW; Lau TK; Fung TY; Leung TY; Wang CC; Choy KW
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 19018765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal and postnatal findings in small-for-gestational-age fetuses without structural ultrasound anomalies at 18-24 weeks.
de Wit MC; Srebniak MI; Joosten M; Govaerts LC; Kornelisse RF; Papatsonis DN; de Graaff K; Knapen MF; Bruggenwirth HT; de Vries FA; Van Veen S; Van Opstal D; Galjaard RJ; Go AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 27102944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal findings and delineation of de novo concurrent partial trisomy 7q(7q31.2 --> qter) and partial monosomy 6q(6q26 --> qter) by high-resolution array CGH.
Choy KW; Chan LW; Tang MH; Ng LK; Leung TY; Lau TK
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Nov; 22(11):1014-20. PubMed ID: 19900039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal detection of a subtle unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by karyotyping, FISH and array comparative genomic hybridization.
Cain CC; Saul DO; Oehler E; Blakemore K; Stetten G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 18818501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatally diagnosed balanced chromosome rearrangements: eight years' experience.
Peng HH; Chao AS; Wang TH; Chang YL; Chang SD
J Reprod Med; 2006 Sep; 51(9):699-703. PubMed ID: 17039698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies.
Shaffer LG; Dabell MP; Fisher AJ; Coppinger J; Bandholz AM; Ellison JW; Ravnan JB; Torchia BS; Ballif BC; Rosenfeld JA
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Oct; 32(10):976-85. PubMed ID: 22865506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis.
Mademont-Soler I; Morales C; Soler A; Martínez-Crespo JM; Shen Y; Margarit E; Clusellas N; Obón M; Wu BL; Sánchez A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 23233332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization technique in genetic analysis of patients with spontaneous abortion].
Chu Y; Wu D; Hou QF; Huo XD; Gao Y; Wang T; Wang HD; Yang YL; Liao SX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 27561938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of high resolution whole genome array CGH in the prenatal clinical setting: advantages, challenges, and review of the literature.
Evangelidou P; Alexandrou A; Moutafi M; Ioannides M; Antoniou P; Koumbaris G; Kallikas I; Velissariou V; Sismani C; Patsalis PC
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():346762. PubMed ID: 23555083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of fetal submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in failed array CGH samples: copy number by sequencing as an alternative to microarrays for invasive fetal testing.
Cohen K; Tzika A; Wood H; Berri S; Roberts P; Mason G; Sheridan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 25510919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
