These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31542538)
41. Intravascular ultrasound-derived morphological predictors of myocardial ischemia assessed by stress myocardial perfusion computed tomography. Kang SJ; Yang DH; Koo HJ; Yun SC; Lee JG; Kang JW; Lim TH; Mintz GS; Park SW; Kim YH Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 89(7):E207-E216. PubMed ID: 27567025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging. Ko SM; Hwang HK; Kim SM; Cho IH Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():1-21. PubMed ID: 25809387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial. Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study. Sand NPR; Veien KT; Nielsen SS; Nørgaard BL; Larsen P; Johansen A; Hess S; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Junker A; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Jensen LO JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1640-1650. PubMed ID: 29909103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Systematic assessment of procedural parameters, influence on downstream testing and 12-month outcomes of a CT-myocardial perfusion service. Ho KT; Ong HY; Ong S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(3):11-20. PubMed ID: 31040061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. 3D fusion of coronary CT angiography and CT myocardial perfusion imaging: Intuitive assessment of morphology and function. von Spiczak J; Manka R; Mannil M; Oebel S; Hamada S; Higashigaito K; Klotz E; Ruschitzka F; Alkadhi H J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):437-443. PubMed ID: 28916411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Multicentre multi-device hybrid imaging study of coronary artery disease: results from the EValuation of INtegrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischaemic Heart Disease (EVINCI) hybrid imaging population. Liga R; Vontobel J; Rovai D; Marinelli M; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Chiappino D; Marraccini P; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Filardi PP; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Stehli J; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Underwood SR; Knuuti J; Kaufmann PA; Neglia D; Gaemperli O; Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 17(9):951-60. PubMed ID: 26992419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. PET measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow and LV function in dilated cardiomyopathy. Gewirtz H JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 21565745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study. Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [ Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fusion of CT coronary angiography and whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac MR perfusion: building a framework for comprehensive cardiac imaging. von Spiczak J; Manka R; Gotschy A; Oebel S; Kozerke S; Hamada S; Alkadhi H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):649-660. PubMed ID: 29080955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Diagnostic Performance of Myocardial CT Perfusion Imaging With or Without Coronary CT Angiography. Siontis KC; Gersh BJ; Williamson EE; Foley TA; Askew JW; Anavekar NS JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 9(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 26093926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Magnetic resonance Adenosine perfusion imaging as Gatekeeper of invasive coronary intervention (MAGnet): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Buckert D; Witzel S; Cieslik M; Tibi R; Rottbauer W; Bernhardt P Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):358. PubMed ID: 28754155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. CACS and the Frequency of Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia During MPI: A Meta-Analysis. Bavishi C; Argulian E; Chatterjee S; Rozanski A JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):580-9. PubMed ID: 27085440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis. Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging to detect coronary artery lesions in children. Vijarnsorn C; Noga M; Schantz D; Pepelassis D; Tham EB Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 33(5):699-709. PubMed ID: 28000002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]