These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31543083)

  • 1. Improved Accuracy on Lateralized Spatial Judgments in Healthy Aging.
    Williamson JB; Murphy A; Lamb DG; Schwartz Z; Szeles D; Harciarek M; Mańkowska A; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Nov; 25(10):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 31543083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-related changes in the allocation of spatially directed focal attention.
    Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Michałowski J; Harciarek M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Sep; 27(5):748-764. PubMed ID: 31610738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hand asymmetries of tactile attention in younger and older adults.
    Kesayan T; Gasoyan H; Lamb DG; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Dec; 41(10):1088-1096. PubMed ID: 31441368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-Related Changes in the Allocation of Vertical Attention.
    Mańkowska A; Heilman KM; Williamson JB; Harciarek M
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2018 Nov; 24(10):1121-1124. PubMed ID: 30165918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right hemispatial ipsilesional neglect with chronic right hemisphere strokes.
    Williamson JB; Lamb DG; Burtis DB; Haque S; M Zilli E; Kesayan T; Harciarek M; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):347-356. PubMed ID: 28812421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tactile rod bisection in the absence of visuo-spatial processing in children, mid-age and older adults.
    Brooks JL; Della Sala S; Logie RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3392-8. PubMed ID: 21875610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetrical distractibility of global and focal visuospatial attention during segmental and total compound line bisections.
    Mosquera DM; Lamb DG; Garcia AM; Rodriguez JA; Correa LN; Salazar L; Schwartz ZJ; Cohen RA; Falchook AD; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Oct; 32(7):843-849. PubMed ID: 29985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental changes in visual line bisection in women throughout adulthood.
    Beste C; Hamm JP; Hausmann M
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):753-67. PubMed ID: 16995835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.
    Shah-Basak PP; Chen P; Caulfield K; Medina J; Hamilton RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():6-13. PubMed ID: 29578025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space.
    Barrett AM; Crosson JB; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2000 May; 6(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 10902414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.