BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31543316)

  • 21. Influence of coincident distal radius fracture in patients with hip fracture: single-centre series and meta-analysis.
    Uzoigwe CE; Venkatesan M; Johnson N; Lee K; Magaji S; Cutler L
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Jun; 16(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 24374902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of outcomes between hip fracture patients with concurrent upper limb injuries and patients with an isolated hip fracture.
    Ng A; Mattin A; Seymour H; McKinnon E
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jan; 89(1-2):57-60. PubMed ID: 30497096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variations in bone mineral density of proximal femora of elderly people with hip fractures: a case-control analysis.
    Wu CC; Wang CJ; Shyu YI
    J Trauma; 2011 Dec; 71(6):1720-5. PubMed ID: 21841516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Risk factors affecting hip fracture patterns in an elderly Korean patient population.
    Che SH; Cho MR; Quinn PM; Song SK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Aug; 102(33):e34573. PubMed ID: 37603514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Simultaneous hip and upper limb fracture in the elderly: incidence, features and management considerations.
    Mulhall KJ; Ahmed A; Khan Y; Masterson E
    Injury; 2002 Jan; 33(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 11879829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concurrent fractures of the hip and wrist: a matched analysis of elderly patients.
    Tow BP; Chua BS; Fook-Chong S; Howe TS
    Injury; 2009 Apr; 40(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 19230886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incidence and cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during 2001. A methodological approach by the national hospital database.
    Maravic M; Le Bihan C; Landais P; Fardellone P
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1475-80. PubMed ID: 16217587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The epidemiology of multifocal upper limb fractures.
    Broadbent MR; Quaba O; Hadjucka C; McQueen MM
    Scand J Surg; 2003; 92(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 14582546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae.
    Fox KM; Magaziner J; Hebel JR; Kenzora JE; Kashner TM
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 1999 Dec; 54(12):M635-40. PubMed ID: 10647970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Concomitant fractures in patients with proximal femoral fractures lead to a prolonged hospital stay but not to increased complication rates or in-house mortality if treated surgically: a matched pair analysis.
    Fenwick A; Pfann M; Mayr J; Antonovska I; Von der Helm F; Nuber S; Förch S; Mayr E
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Mar; 35(3):607-614. PubMed ID: 36694062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with contralateral hip fracture after initial hip fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Zhao L; Tian S; Sha W; Wang L; Xu Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14292. PubMed ID: 38906978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan.
    Hagino H; Yamamoto K; Ohshiro H; Nakamura T; Kishimoto H; Nose T
    Bone; 1999 Mar; 24(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 10071921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical assessment of patients with isolated hip fractures associated with an upper limb fracture.
    Gómez-Álvarez J; González-Escobar S; Gil-Garay E
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed); 2018; 62(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 29196226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re-admission to Level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery - Risk factors, reasons and outcome.
    Buecking B; Eschbach D; Koutras C; Kratz T; Balzer-Geldsetzer M; Dodel R; Ruchholtz S
    Injury; 2013 Dec; 44(12):1919-25. PubMed ID: 23791011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multicentre, prospective, randomised comparison of the sliding hip screw with the Medoff sliding screw and side plate for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.
    McCormack R; Panagiotopolous K; Buckley R; Penner M; Perey B; Pate G; Goetz T; Piper M
    Injury; 2013 Dec; 44(12):1904-9. PubMed ID: 23876624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incidence of four major types of osteoporotic fragility fractures among elderly individuals in Sado, Japan, in 2015.
    Imai N; Endo N; Shobugawa Y; Oinuma T; Takahashi Y; Suzuki K; Ishikawa Y; Makino T; Suzuki H; Miyasaka D; Sakuma M
    J Bone Miner Metab; 2019 May; 37(3):484-490. PubMed ID: 29956020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distal radius fracture risk reduction with a comprehensive osteoporosis management program.
    Harness NG; Funahashi T; Dell R; Adams AL; Burchette R; Chen X; Greene D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 37(8):1543-9. PubMed ID: 22748352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Post-surgical rehabilitative approach to fragility fractures.
    Gimigliano F; Iolascon G; Riccio I; Frizzi L; Gimigliano R
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S23-5. PubMed ID: 24046054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does integrity of the lesser trochanter influence the surgical outcome of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients?
    Liu X; Liu Y; Pan S; Cao H; Yu D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():47. PubMed ID: 25879412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictive factors of hospital stay, mortality and functional recovery after surgery for hip fracture in elderly patients.
    Pareja Sierra T; Bartolomé Martín I; Rodríguez Solís J; Bárcena Goitiandia L; Torralba González de Suso M; Morales Sanz MD; Hornillos Calvo M
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2017; 61(6):427-435. PubMed ID: 28888685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.