These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31543357)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.
    Kishore Pebbili G; Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Rashmi J; Gopi Sankar R; Nethra R; Shreya S; Shashish G
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):159.e11-159.e18. PubMed ID: 31543357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population.
    Jayakumar T; Rajasudhakar R; Benoy JJ
    J Voice; 2024 Sep; 38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. PubMed ID: 35337701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
    Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
    Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
    Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language].
    Choynzonov EL; Kononova LA; Krasavina EA; Kulbakin DE; Mukhina VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(5):34-38. PubMed ID: 36404688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.
    Englert M; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):160.e15-160.e21. PubMed ID: 31474432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
    Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.
    Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM
    J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The acoustic voice quality index, version 2.06 and 3.01, for the Persian-speaking population.
    Zainaee S; Khadivi E; Jamali J; Sobhani-Rad D; Maryn Y; Ghaemi H
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 100():106279. PubMed ID: 36399989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
    Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e1-646.e10. PubMed ID: 30583889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comprehensive Application for Grading Severity of Voice Based on Acoustic Voice Quality Index v.02.03.
    Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Gopi Sankar R; Sridharan KV; Vasanthalakshmi MS
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 36192290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.
    Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Accuracy of DSI and AVQI v.02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Levels of Dysphonia in Kannada Speaking Population.
    Shabnam S; Pushpavathi M; Gopi Sankar R
    J Voice; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38964962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Correlate with Perceived Creak and Strain in Normophonic Young Adult Finnish Females?
    Laukkanen AM; Rantala L
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 33784702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
    Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.