These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31544234)

  • 1. Health-related quality of life in oncology drug reimbursement submissions in Canada: A review of submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.
    Raymakers AJN; Regier DA; Peacock SJ
    Cancer; 2020 Jan; 126(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 31544234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Submitted for Reimbursement Recommendation Decisions in Canada.
    Meyers DE; Jenei K; Chisamore TM; Gyawali B
    JAMA Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 181(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 33616606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study.
    Lexchin J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030750. PubMed ID: 31350254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relative Importance of Clinical, Economic, Patient Values and Feasibility Criteria in Cancer Drug Reimbursement in Canada: A Revealed Preferences Analysis of Recommendations of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review 2011-2017.
    Skedgel C; Wranik D; Hu M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Apr; 36(4):467-475. PubMed ID: 29353385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value-based pricing: Toward achieving a balance between individual and population gains in health benefits.
    Parmar A; Jiao T; Saluja R; Chan KKW
    Cancer Med; 2020 Jan; 9(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 31711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reimbursement recommendations for cancer drugs supported by phase II evidence in Canada.
    Li YYR; Mai H; Trudeau ME; Mittmann N; Chiasson K; Chan KKW; Cheung MC
    Curr Oncol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):e495-e500. PubMed ID: 33173389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Manufacturer Submitted and Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Reanalysed Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for Novel Oncology Drugs.
    Saluja R; Jiao T; Koshy L; Cheung M; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):606-618. PubMed ID: 33498460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional approval of cancer drugs in Canada: accountability and impact on public funding.
    Andersen SK; Penner N; Chambers A; Trudeau ME; Chan KKW; Cheung MC
    Curr Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(1):e100-e105. PubMed ID: 30853815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New Cancer Drug Approvals From the Perspective of a Universal Healthcare System: Analyses of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Recommendations.
    Niraula S; Nugent Z
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Dec; 16(12):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 30545993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are We Making a Difference? A Qualitative Study of Patient Engagement at the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: Perspectives of Patient Groups.
    Mercer RE; Chambers A; Mai H; McDonald V; McMahon C; Chan KKW
    Value Health; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1157-1162. PubMed ID: 32940233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value assessment in oncology drugs: funding of drugs for metastatic breast cancer in Canada.
    Lemieux J; Audet S
    Curr Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(Suppl 1):S161-S170. PubMed ID: 29910659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses.
    Mirzayeh Fashami F; Tarride JE; Sadeghirad B; Hariri K; Peyrovinasab A; Levine M
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39103675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation and use of economic evidence to inform cancer drug reimbursement decisions in Canada.
    Yong JH; Beca J; Hoch JS
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Mar; 31(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 23322588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
    Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Joshy J; Rawson NS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2024 May; 13(5):e230178. PubMed ID: 38567953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of clinician input in Canadian funding decisions for cancer drugs: a cross-sectional study based on CADTH reimbursement recommendations.
    Jenei K; Meyers DE
    BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e066378. PubMed ID: 37844982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada.
    Nagase FNI; Stafinski T; Sun J; Jhangri G; Menon D
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 Jun; 14(1):127. PubMed ID: 31174574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do cost-effectiveness analyses inform reimbursement decisions for oncology medicines in Canada? The example of sunitinib for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Chabot I; Rocchi A
    Value Health; 2010; 13(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 20561332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the association between oncology drug clinical benefit and the time to public reimbursement.
    Thomson S; Everest L; Witzke N; Jiao T; Delos Santos S; Nguyen V; Cheung MC; Chan KKW
    Cancer Med; 2022 Jan; 11(2):380-391. PubMed ID: 34850587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health technology assessment of drugs for rare diseases: insights, trends, and reasons for negative recommendations from the CADTH common drug review.
    Janoudi G; Amegatse W; McIntosh B; Sehgal C; Richter T
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(1):164. PubMed ID: 27908281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.
    Rocchi A; Menon D; Verma S; Miller E
    Value Health; 2008; 11(4):771-83. PubMed ID: 18179658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.