BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31544328)

  • 1. Tamponade effect of resorbable biological barrier in quality of obturation in primary molar.
    Kakade A; Shetty H; Santosh A; Mali S; Badnaware S; Deshmukh B; Banthiya K
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Nov; 10(4):e12468. PubMed ID: 31544328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Gilhotra K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 35(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 22046693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars.
    Walia T; Ghanbari AH; Mathew S; Ziadlou AH
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Feb; 18(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 27885586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Degradation evaluation and success of pulpectomy with a modified primary root canal filling in primary molars].
    Chen XX; Lin BC; Zhong J; Ge LH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 26080888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars: An
    Ellana Jermiah J; Rao A; Srikant N; Rao A; Suprabha BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(6):372-375. PubMed ID: 31657988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment Outcomes of Pulpectomy in Primary Maxillary Incisors Filled with ZOE and Metapex: A Two-year Retrospective Study.
    Ou-Yang LW; Chang PC; Chuang LC; Yu HT; Tsai AI
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Apr; 45(2):83-89. PubMed ID: 33951162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical and radiographic study of four different root canal fillings in primary molars.
    Al-Ostwani AO; Al-Monaqel BM; Al-Tinawi MK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 26838149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth.
    Gupta S; Das G
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 21985878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zinc oxide eugenol paste jeopardises the adhesive bonding to primary dentine.
    Pires CW; Lenzi TL; Soares FZM; Rocha RO
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Jun; 19(3):163-169. PubMed ID: 29754275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Primary Teeth Obturated With Zinc Oxide Eugenol versus Metapex: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Paranna S; Biradar J; Semwal M; Patil K; Suradkar S; Shinde S
    Mymensingh Med J; 2022 Oct; 31(4):1148-1152. PubMed ID: 36189565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study.
    Holan G; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8153002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resorbable Collagen Barrier Impeding the Extrusion of Obturating Material in Primary Molars Undergoing Resorption - A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Sanjeev MN; Kaur H; Mayall SS; Rishika ; Yeluri R
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Nov; 45(5):312-316. PubMed ID: 34740265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prevention of endodontic interappointment emergencies after one-visit root canal therapy on deciduous teeth with METAPEX].
    Zhong ZQ; Han JL; He H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Oct; 18(5):486-8. PubMed ID: 19907854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth.
    Bawazir OA; Salama FS
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 16615374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials for primary molars: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Nadkarni U; Damle SG
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2000 Mar; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11323998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    RojaRamya KS; Vinay C; Uloopi KS; Chandrasekhar R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 32611864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a biological barrier in pulpectomies of primary molars.
    Johnson MS; Britto LR; Guelmann M
    Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 17249431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study.
    Grover R; Mehra M; Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 23758458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study.
    Ramar K; Mungara J
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 20215668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Asokan S; Sooriaprakas C; Raghu V; Bairavi R
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2012; 79(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 22828756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.