These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31546091)

  • 21. [Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: laparoscopic or vaginal sacrocolpopexy?].
    Descargues G; Collard P; Grise P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Oct; 36(10):978-83. PubMed ID: 18823810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simplified Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy.
    Jan H; Ghai V; Thakar R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1134. PubMed ID: 29371171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical and functional outcomes.
    Chan CM; Liang HH; Go WW; To WW; Mok KM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Aug; 17(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Diwan A; Rardin CR; Strohsnitter WC; Weld A; Rosenblatt P; Kohli N
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jan; 17(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: a minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse.
    Medina C; Takacs P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):472-5. PubMed ID: 16962535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laparoscopic treatment of pelvic floor defects in women of reproductive age.
    Seracchioli R; Hourcabie JA; Vianello F; Govoni F; Pollastri P; Venturoli S
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Aug; 11(3):332-5. PubMed ID: 15559343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse.
    Dessie SG; Park M; Rosenblatt PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 25990208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension.
    Bedford ND; Seman EI; O'Shea RT; Keirse MJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 23321154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Advanced uterine prolapse during pregnancy: pre- and postnatal management].
    Pizzoferrato AC; Bui C; Fauconnier A; Bader G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):467-70. PubMed ID: 23867760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Uterine sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse: safety and feasibility.
    Lee T; Rosenblum N; Nitti V; Brucker BM
    J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1131-6. PubMed ID: 23713544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients].
    Cosson M; Bogaert E; Narducci F; Querleu D; Crépin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):746-750. PubMed ID: 11139710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse.
    Maher CF; Carey MP; Murray CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 11393196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of complete uterovaginal prolapse.
    Grigoriadis T; Protopapas A; Chatzipapas I; Athanasiou S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Mar; 26(3):449-50. PubMed ID: 25338729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Li C; Dai Z; Shu H
    Trials; 2018 Mar; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 29506566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Paraiso MF; Chen CC
    Minerva Ginecol; 2006 Oct; 58(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 17006425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
    Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic uterine sling suspension: a new technique of uterine suspension in women desiring surgical management of uterine prolapse with uterine conservation.
    Hogston P
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):131. PubMed ID: 18053114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.