116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31546985)
1. The Effect of Different Rejection Letters on Applicants' Reactions.
Cortini M; Galanti T; Barattucci M
Behav Sci (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 31546985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.
Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
J Appl Psychol; 1998 Feb; 83(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9494438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
Bye HH; Sandal GM
J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applicant Fairness Perceptions of a Robot-Mediated Job Interview: A Video Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.
Nørskov S; Damholdt MF; Ulhøi JP; Jensen MB; Ess C; Seibt J
Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():586263. PubMed ID: 33501344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An experimental test of the impact of drug-testing programs on potential job applicants' attitudes and intentions.
Crant JM; Bateman TS
J Appl Psychol; 1990 Apr; 75(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 2335489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining personal talents and behavioral styles of applicants to surgical training: a new look at an old problem, part II.
Bell RM; Fann SA; Morrison JE; Lisk JR
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22208827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools.
Hilliard A; Guenole N; Leutner F
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():940456. PubMed ID: 35959005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The power of e-recruitment and employer branding on Indonesian millennials' intention to apply for a job.
Wijaya CN; Mustika MD; Bulut S; Bukhori B
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1062525. PubMed ID: 36687985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician Perception of Pay Fairness and its Association with Work Satisfaction, Intent to Leave Practice, and Personal Health.
Kao AC; Jager AJ; Koenig BA; Moller AC; Tutty MA; Williams GC; Wright SM
J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 33(6):812-817. PubMed ID: 29380217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.
Wilhelmy A; Kleinmann M; Melchers KG; Götz M
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():740. PubMed ID: 28611696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks.
Ployhart RE; Ryan AM
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1997 Dec; 72(3):308-35. PubMed ID: 9606169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of characteristics shown in self introduction letter and professor's recommendation letter].
Kim SH
Korean J Med Educ; 2013 Sep; 25(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 25804848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardized letters of recommendation and successful match into otolaryngology.
Kimple AJ; McClurg SW; Del Signore AG; Tomoum MO; Lin FC; Senior BA
Laryngoscope; 2016 May; 126(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 26839977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender and Letters of Recommendation: A Linguistic Comparison of the Impact of Gender on General Surgery Residency Applicants
French JC; Zolin SJ; Lampert E; Aiello A; Bencsath KP; Ritter KA; Strong AT; Lipman JM; Valente MA; Prabhu AS
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):899-905. PubMed ID: 30598383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gendered Differences in Letters of Recommendation for Transplant Surgery Fellowship Applicants.
Hoffman A; Grant W; McCormick M; Jezewski E; Matemavi P; Langnas A
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(2):427-432. PubMed ID: 30266555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Intentions of Letter Writers for Applicants to a Baccalaureate-M.D. Program: Self-Report and Content Analyses of Letters of Reference.
Mavis BE; Shafer CL; Magallanes BM
Med Educ Online; 2006 Dec; 11(1):4586. PubMed ID: 28253785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
